Chandra et al. (2018) have conducted seismic hazard and probability assessment of the Kashmir valley by following multifaceted research methodologies that have mainly used the earthquake data from the United States Geological Survey, which ranges from 1902–2017. These data are supplemented by the lithological, geomorphological, geotechnical, hydrogeological and socio-economic datasets. However, the results are conflicting, contradictory, and questionable, because the authors have used scientifically invalid research methods. Therefore, the comment aims to highlight the major concerns with a motivation to offer solutions that could help the authors to refine the science on the earthquake hazards in the region.

钱德拉等人。(2018) 通过多方面的研究方法对克什米尔山谷进行了地震危险性和概率评估，主要使用了美国地质调查局 1902-2017 年的地震数据。这些数据由岩性、地貌、岩土、水文地质和社会经济数据集补充。然而，结果是矛盾的、矛盾的和值得怀疑的，因为作者使用了科学上无效的研究方法。因此，该评论旨在突出主要问题，并提供解决方案，帮助作者完善该地区地震灾害的科学。