The article explores the process of legal and judicial integration of Transylvania within Greater Romania, focusing on how Romanian legal professionals experienced the transition from the Habsburg Empire to the Romanian nation-state. I argue that lawyers, judges, and jurists placed greater importance on legal tradition, professional solidarity, and the pursuit of personal interests than nationalism. Building on Pierre Bourdieu’s notion of the juridical field, the article investigates how the traditions and categories of judgment typical of legal professionals often hampered the nationalization projects undertaken by the Romanian government, thereby casting new light on the process of Romanian state building in the early 1920s. Furthermore, the present piece addresses the issue of the imperial legacy, exploring the relationship between new and old laws and the reasons behind the former legislative structure surviving the political upheaval of 1918.

本文探讨了特兰西瓦尼亚在大罗马尼亚境内的法律和司法整合过程，重点关注罗马尼亚法律专业人士如何经历从哈布斯堡帝国到罗马尼亚民族国家的转变。我认为，与民族主义相比，律师、法官和法学家更重视法律传统、职业团结和对个人利益的追求。基于皮埃尔·布尔迪厄的司法领域概念，本文调查了法律专业人士典型的判断传统和类别如何经常阻碍罗马尼亚政府实施的国有化项目，从而为 1920 年代初期罗马尼亚国家建设的进程带来新的启示。 . 此外，目前的作品解决了帝国遗产的问题，