当前位置: X-MOL 学术Conflict Resolution Quarterly › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Models of mediation: Theoretical and legal analysis
Conflict Resolution Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-07-27 , DOI: 10.1002/crq.21315
Mykola Lohvinenko 1 , Mykola Starynskyi 1 , Lyudmila Rudenko 1 , Iryna Kordunian 2
Affiliation  

The research is relevant since the success of mediation largely depends on the model of the process chosen by the mediator at the stage of preparation. This article aims to study different models of mediation, such as facilitative mediation, evaluative, transformative, e-mediation, mixed mediation, mediation-arbitration, narrative mediation, “Shuttle” mediation, court-mandated mediation, and a lot of others. The key method of research on this issue is the method of analysis, which was used to characterize and determine the characteristics of different models of mediation, and to classify these models according to different criteria. The results showed that among all the studied models, facilitative mediation is the most popular in use. It focuses on the interests of the parties, reflecting the main goal of this procedure, which is to achieve a solution that meets the interests of all parties, and mixed mediation, when the mediator combines different mediation models, using the benefits of each. The study concluded that the mediator should take into account the content of the dispute, the interests of the parties, and the relationship between them, and choose the style of the process that best suits the specific situation. The materials of the article can be used to develop legislation regulating mediation in Ukraine. The results of this study can be used by scientists to conduct theoretical and practical research in the field of alternative dispute resolution, as well as mediators to increase the level of knowledge in the preparation for mediation.

中文翻译:

调解模式:理论和法律分析

该研究是相关的,因为调解的成功在很大程度上取决于调解员在准备阶段选择的过程模型。本文旨在研究不同的调解模式,例如促进性调解、评估性、变革性、电子调解、混合调解、调解仲裁、叙事调解、“穿梭”调解、法院授权调解等。研究这一问题的关键方法是分析方法,它被用来表征和确定不同中介模型的特征,并根据不同的标准对这些模型进行分类。结果表明,在所有研究的模型中,促进调解是最常用的。它侧重于当事人的利益,反映了本程序的主要目标,即达到满足各方利益的解决方案,混合调解,调解员结合不同的调解模式,利用各自的利益。研究认为,调解员应综合考虑争议的内容、当事人的利益以及双方的关系,选择最适合具体情况的程序方式。该文章的材料可用于制定规范乌克兰调解的立法。这项研究的结果可供科学家在替代性争议解决领域进行理论和实践研究,以及调解员提高准备调解的知识水平。当中介结合不同的中介模型,利用各​​自的好处时。研究认为,调解员应综合考虑争议的内容、当事人的利益以及双方的关系,选择最适合具体情况的程序方式。该文章的材料可用于制定规范乌克兰调解的立法。这项研究的结果可供科学家在替代性争议解决领域进行理论和实践研究,以及调解员提高准备调解的知识水平。当中介结合不同的中介模型,利用各​​自的好处时。研究认为,调解员应综合考虑争议的内容、当事人的利益以及双方的关系,选择最适合具体情况的程序方式。该文章的材料可用于制定规范乌克兰调解的立法。这项研究的结果可供科学家在替代性争议解决领域进行理论和实践研究,以及调解员提高准备调解的知识水平。并选择最适合具体情况的流程风格。该文章的材料可用于制定规范乌克兰调解的立法。这项研究的结果可供科学家在替代性争议解决领域进行理论和实践研究,以及调解员提高准备调解的知识水平。并选择最适合具体情况的流程风格。该文章的材料可用于制定规范乌克兰调解的立法。这项研究的结果可供科学家在替代性争议解决领域进行理论和实践研究,以及调解员提高准备调解的知识水平。
更新日期:2021-09-01
down
wechat
bug