The Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division (NSWCCD) Model 5365 (R/V Athena) was chosen to facilitate the detailed comparison of experiments and simulations of a semi-planing hull in calm water and waves. This paper focuses on the comparison of the calm water experimental results from three different tests with four simulation predictions from two computational codes. The comparisons show differences with the same order of magnitude as comparisons of experimental and simulation with large displacement vessels. The MxN-order level analysis has shown that the scatter in the data between the three experiments dominates the experimental uncertainty in the semi-planing regime. The N-Version analysis of the four simulations shows that the scatter in results for both the experiments and the simulations drives the state-of-the-art uncertainty. The resistance, trim, and sinkage was validated at a variety of speeds for individual codes and the simulation mean. This study has shown the importance of experimental setup and the initial conditions of numerical simulations when comparing experimental and numerical simulation results. The errors due to the hydrostatic setup and the transom radius proved to be a contributor to the error between the experiments and simulations.

海军水面作战中心 Carderock Division (NSWCCD) 5365 型（R/V Athena) 的选择是为了便于在平静的水面和波浪中对半滑行船体的实验和模拟进行详细比较。本文重点比较了来自三个不同测试的静水实验结果与来自两个计算代码的四个模拟预测。这些比较显示了与大排量容器的实验和模拟比较具有相同数量级的差异。MxN 级水平分析表明，三个实验之间数据的分散支配了半刨削制度中的实验不确定性。四个模拟的 N 版本分析表明，实验和模拟结果的分散驱动了最先进的不确定性。阻力，修剪，下沉在各种速度下针对各个代码和模拟平均值进行了验证。本研究表明，在比较实验和数值模拟结果时，实验设置和数值模拟初始条件的重要性。由静压设置和横梁半径引起的误差被证明是导致实验和模拟之间误差的一个因素。