当前位置: X-MOL 学术Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Interoceptive Accuracy as a Function of Hypnotizability
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis ( IF 2.0 ) Pub Date : 2021-07-27 , DOI: 10.1080/00207144.2021.1954859
Anna Rosati 1 , Iacopo Belcari 1 , Enrica L Santarcangelo 1 , Laura Sebastiani 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to measure the interoceptive accuracy (IA) of individuals with high (highs), medium (mediums), and low hypnotizability (lows) through the heartbeat-counting task during 3 relaxation trials. Participants completed the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA), ECG and skin conductance (SC) were monitored, and the experienced difficulty in counting was reported. Results showed similar counting difficulty and number of actual heartbeats in highs, mediums, and lows. SC decreased in highs during all trials, in mediums and lows only in the third trial. IA measured as [1 – (ǀrecorded heartbeats–counted heartbeatsǀ)/recorded heartbeats] was negatively correlated with hypnotizability and not correlated with interoceptive sensitivity (IS) measured by MAIA scales. Among mediums, IA was higher in males than in females.



中文翻译:

作为催眠性函数的内感受准确度

摘要

本研究旨在测量具有高(高)、中(中)和低(低)催眠能力的个体的内感受准确度 (IA )通过 3 次放松试验期间的心跳计数任务。参与者完成了内感受意识的多维评估 (MAIA),监测了心电图和皮肤电导 (SC),并报告了计数方面的困难。结果显示,高、中和低的计数难度和实际心跳次数相似。在所有试验中,SC 在高点下降,仅在第三次试验中下降到中点和低点。IA 测量为 [1 – (ǀrecorded heartbeats-counted heartbeatsǀ)/recorded heartbeats] 与催眠性呈负相关,与 MAIA 量表测量的内感受敏感性 (IS) 无关。在培养基中,男性的 IA 高于女性。

更新日期:2021-09-22
down
wechat
bug