• The ‘replication crisis’ in science raises serious questions about the objectivity and reliability of the peer-review process.
• Much of the literature, contributed on the topic in the past by former editors, has focused on the role of reviewers, and their possible biases.
• However, experience in practice shows that editors also contribute significantly, at different levels, to the lack of objectivity of peer-review.
• Various techniques, including network analysis and machine learning, can be implemented to remedy the situation and restore the gatekeeping role of peer review.

中文翻译：

---

同行评审过程的客观性：经久不衰的神话、现实和可能的补救措施

• 科学中的“复制危机”对同行评审过程的客观性和可靠性提出了严重的问题。
• 过去由前任编辑撰写的关于该主题的大部分文献都集中在审稿人的角色及其可能的偏见上。
• 然而，实践经验表明，编辑在不同层面也对同行评审缺乏客观性做出了重大贡献。
• 可以实施包括网络分析和机器学习在内的各种技术来纠正这种情况并恢复同行评审的把关角色。