Is there tension in a view of the conditions of being in a proper position to make aesthetic evaluations that is committed to aesthetic autonomy and norms of exposure? I define ‘aesthetic autonomy’ in terms of the Kantian idea that in order to make a proper aesthetic evaluation, one must rely on oneself rather than on any outside source. I define ‘norms of exposure’ in terms of the Humean idea that practice and aesthetic education are conditions of proper aesthetic evaluation. Prima facie, these two commitments point toward competing accounts of whether exposure is a condition of being in a position to make proper aesthetic evaluations. However, I argue that a closer look at the Kantian position reveals that aesthetic exposure is a condition of being able to make aesthetic evaluations in an autonomous way in the Kantian framework.

中文翻译：

---

审美自主与曝光规范

在致力于审美自主和曝光规范的审美评价处于适当位置的情况下，是否存在紧张关系？我根据康德的观点来定义“审美自主”，即为了做出适当的审美评价，一个人必须依靠自己而不是任何外部来源。我根据休谟的观念来定义“暴露规范”，即实践和审美教育是适当审美评价的条件。初步的，这两个承诺指向了关于暴露是否是能够进行适当美学评估的条件的相互竞争的解释。然而，我认为，仔细研究康德的立场会发现，审美暴露是能够在康德框架中以自主方式进行审美评价的条件。