The field of entrepreneurship education (EE) is still new, but it is growing very quickly, with potential to strengthen business education, innovation and economies. Only recently has attention been paid to the quality of the research being produced. Building on previous reviews, this paper uses systematic review methodology to search and grade the most recent literature in EE in higher education. This process finds that some high-quality research is being done but much of the field is held back by methodological limitations, including inadequate description of EE programs, heavy reliance on correlational survey designs, common self-selection bias and a paucity of studies able to establish causal effects on entrepreneurial outcomes. A small number (10) of high-quality studies provide evidence of the effectiveness of experiential programs, within university extracurricular programs; and provide a range of findings to inform current EE practice. Gaps for future research and methodological possibilities are outlined, so that EE research can address current weaknesses and fulfil its potential to inform EE, enabling effective teaching and learning and the prospect of long-term educational, economic and social outcomes.

创业教育 (EE) 领域仍然是新领域，但发展非常迅速，具有加强商业教育、创新和经济的潜力。直到最近，人们才注意到正在进行的研究的质量。在先前评论的基础上，本文使用系统评论方法来搜索和评分高等教育中 EE 的最新文献。这个过程发现一些高质量的研究正在进行中，但该领域的大部分研究都受到方法论的限制，包括对 EE 项目的描述不充分、严重依赖相关调查设计、常见的自我选择偏差以及缺乏能够建立对创业结果的因果影响。少数 (10) 项高质量研究提供了体验式计划有效性的证据，在大学课外项目中；并提供一系列调查结果以告知当前的 EE 实践。概述了未来研究和方法论可能性的差距，以便 EE 研究可以解决当前的弱点并发挥其为 EE 提供信息的潜力，从而实现有效的教学和学习以及长期教育、经济和社会成果的前景。