Objective: This article problematizes the use of resilience as a psychological and developmental indication of well-being. We base our argument on the possibility that resilience theories internalize responsibility for survival within the individual, and that survival is dependent on the ability to assimilate to injustice. Resistance, on the other hand, represents acts of intentional, active, and often collective survival which can expose and oppose social injustice. Method: Bringing together transdisciplinary scholarship on resistance, we propose a conceptual framework of sociocultural resistance. This framework seeks to forward studies of health that acknowledge the complexity of relationships, culture, and power constitutive of the human condition. Results: We provide examples of sociocultural resistance in the psychological and developmental sciences and suggest the use of diverse theory and methods in the study of resistance. Conclusions: Resistance research is a timely, necessary, and critical turning point in the social sciences with the potential to change unjust systems and promote a nuanced view of health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

播下种子：心理科学中的社会文化阻力。


目的：本文对使用复原力作为幸福感的心理和发展指标提出了问题。我们的论点基于以下可能性：复原力理论将生存责任内化于个人内部，而生存取决于同化不公正的能力。另一方面，抵抗代表有意识的、积极的、通常是集体生存的行为，可以揭露和反对社会不公正。方法：汇集有关抵抗的跨学科学术成果，我们提出了社会文化抵抗的概念框架。该框架旨在推进健康研究，承认构成人类状况的关系、文化和权力的复杂性。结果：我们提供了心理和发展科学中社会文化阻力的例子，并建议在阻力研究中使用不同的理论和方法。结论：抵抗研究是社会科学的一个及时、必要和关键的转折点，有可能改变不公正的制度并促进细致入微的健康观。 （PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA，保留所有权利）。