Abstract

Objective:

Confabulations are false memories which are expressedwithout the intention to deceive and arise following brain damage or psychological dysfunction. Confabulations can become a barrier to effective neuropsychological rehabilitation and consequently, intervention is required.The current review aimed to provide a detailed evaluative account of existing interventions for confabulation and their relative effectiveness.

Method:

The search process found 11 studies conducive with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A methodological quality assessment was then carried out and the majority of included studies demonstrated poor methodological quality.

Results:

Ten types of interventions were identified and the majority of theseled to a reduction or elimination of confabulations.

Conclusion:

Since methodological quality of many included studies was deemed unsatisfactory, further large-scale experimental research and standardised measures are necessary to adequately compare the relative effectiveness of these interventions. Further research and clinical implications are also highlighted.

中文翻译：

---

虚构干预：系统的文献综述

摘要

客观的：

虚构是虚假的记忆，表达时无意欺骗，是在脑损伤或心理功能障碍后出现的。虚构可能成为有效神经心理康复的障碍，因此需要干预。当前的审查旨在对现有的虚构干预措施及其相对有效性提供详细的评估说明。

方法：

搜索过程发现 11 项研究符合纳入和排除标准。然后进行了方法学质量评估，大多数纳入的研究表明方法学质量较差。

结果：

确定了十种类型的干预措施，其中大多数干预措施导致减少或消除虚构。

结论：

由于许多纳入研究的方法学质量被认为不能令人满意，因此有必要进行进一步的大规模实验研究和标准化措施，以充分比较这些干预措施的相对有效性。还强调了进一步的研究和临床意义。