Individuals must constantly adjust their behavior to adapt to the changing environment, and this dynamic adjustment ability has been studied through the conflict adaptation effect (CAE). We explored the resting state brain network underlying individual differences in CAE. The functional connection strength between dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and bilateral insula or right anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) was negatively correlated with CAE, whereas the connection strength between DLPFC and left inferior parietal lobule was positively correlated with CAE. We speculated that, when faced with conflict, individuals with low CAE employ salience network to detect conflict, and then control is performed by DLPFC; in individuals with high CAEs who maintain a high level of control in all tasks, conflict is resolved mainly by the central executive network. In other words, in conflict tasks, individuals with high CAEs adopt proactive control strategies, but their counterparts with low CAEs employ reactive control strategies.

个体必须不断调整自己的行为以适应不断变化的环境，这种动态调整能力已经通过冲突适应效应（CAE）进行了研究。我们探索了 CAE 个体差异背后的静息状态大脑网络。背外侧前额叶皮层 (DLPFC) 与双侧脑岛或右前扣带回皮层 (ACC) 的功能连接强度与 CAE 呈负相关，而 DLPFC 与左顶下小叶之间的连接强度与 CAE 呈正相关。我们推测，当面临冲突时，低 CAE 的个体采用显着性网络来检测冲突，然后由 DLPFC 进行控制；在所有任务中保持高度控制的具有高 CAE 的个人中，冲突主要由中央执行网络解决。换句话说，在冲突任务中，具有高 CAE 的个体采用主动控制策略，而具有低 CAE 的个体则采用反应控制策略。