Treatment integrity is an important component of rigorous educational research. Information about the extent to which an intervention was implemented as planned provides necessary context for interpreting student outcomes. In the context of increasing use of tiered systems in schools, treatment integrity takes on additional practical importance. Tiered systems involve educators evaluating student responsiveness to primary (Tier 1) prevention to determine whether more intensive secondary (Tier 2) or tertiary (Tier 3) interventions are necessary. To ensure validity of these decisions, treatment integrity data are needed to establish whether students had access to Tier 1 implemented with integrity. In this map of the literature, we systematically identified studies of primary prevention components in the context of tiered systems to determine the extent to which treatment integrity was monitored and reported. Additionally, we examined methods used to monitor treatment integrity, the frequency with which monitoring occurred, and at what level monitoring occurred (i.e., at the individual or school level). We discuss implications of findings on measurement and use of these data in tiered systems.

治疗诚信是严谨的教育研究的重要组成部分。有关干预按计划实施的程度的信息为解释学生成果提供了必要的背景。在学校越来越多地使用分层系统的背景下，治疗完整性具有额外的实际重要性。分级系统涉及教育工作者评估学生对初级（第 1 级）预防的反应，以确定是否需要更密集的二级（第 2 级）或第三级（第 3 级）干预措施。为了确保这些决定的有效性，需要处理完整性数据来确定学生是否可以访问以完整性实施的 Tier 1。在这张文学地图中，我们在分层系统的背景下系统地确定了初级预防组件的研究，以确定监测和报告治疗完整性的程度。此外，我们检查了用于监测治疗完整性的方法、监测发生的频率以及监测发生的级别（即，在个人或学校级别）。我们讨论了调查结果对分层系统中这些数据的测量和使用的影响。