当前位置: X-MOL 学术Travel Med. Infect. Dis. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Diagnostic accuracy of fresh drooled saliva for SARS-CoV-2 in travelers
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease ( IF 6.3 ) Pub Date : 2021-07-21 , DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2021.102144
Alif Adlan Mohd Thabit 1 , Kalaiarasu M Peariasamy 2 , Pei Xuan Kuan 3 , Denisa Khoo Fern Ying 4 , Nelson Nheu 5 , Camille Cyncynatus 5 , Muhamad Afiq Mu'iz Arifin 1 , Amira Naziffa Shamsuddin 1 , Mohd Asri Yamin 6 , Muhammad Ashraf Mohd Padzil 1 , Ganeswrie Rajasekaram 5 , Martin Giddy 5 , Sivasooriar Sivaneson 5 , Harvinder Kaur Lakhbeer Singh 5 , Adleen Azman 5 , Afifah Haji Hassan 6 , Suresh Kumar Chidambaram 1
Affiliation  

Background

The standard for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis is RT-PCR from nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs. Major airports require COVID-19 screening, and saliva has the potential as a substitute specimen for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. We investigated the utility of fresh drooled saliva against NPS for COVID-19 screening of travelers.

Methods

We recruited 81 travelers and 15 non-travelers (including ten controls) prospectively within a mean of 3·22 days of RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19. Each study participant provided 2 mls of early morning fresh drooled whole saliva separately into a sterile plastic container and GeneFiX™ saliva collection kit. The saliva specimens were processed within 4 h and tested for SARS-CoV-2 genes (E, RdRP, and N2) and the results compared to paired NPS RT-PCR for diagnostic accuracy.

Results

Majority of travellers were asymptomatic (75·0%) with a mean age of 34·26 years. 77 travelers were RT-PCR positive at the time of hospitalization whilst three travelers had positive contacts. In this group, the detection rate for SARS-CoV-2 with NPS, whole saliva, and GeneFiX™ were comparable (89·3%, 50/56; 87·8%, 43/49; 89·6%, 43/48). Both saliva collection methods were in good agreement (Kappa = 0·69). There was no statistical difference between the detection rates of saliva and NPS (p > 0·05). Detection was highest for the N2 gene whilst the E gene provided the highest viral load (mean = 27·96 to 30·10, SD = 3·14 to 3·85). Saliva specimens have high sensitivity (80·4%) and specificity (90·0%) with a high positive predictive value of 91·8% for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis.

Conclusion

Saliva for SARS-CoV-2 screening is a simple accurate technique comparable with NPS RT-PCR.



中文翻译:

旅行者新鲜流口水对 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断准确性

背景

SARS-CoV-2 的诊断标准是鼻咽或口咽拭子的 RT-PCR。主要机场需要进行 COVID-19 筛查,唾液有可能作为 SARS-CoV-2 诊断的替代标本。我们调查了新鲜流口水对抗 NPS 对旅行者进行 COVID-19 筛查的效用。

方法

我们在 RT-PCR 确认 COVID-19 的平均 3·22 天内前瞻性地招募了 81 名旅行者和 15 名非旅行者(包括 10 名对照组)。每个研究参与者将 2 毫升清晨新鲜流下的全唾液分别放入无菌塑料容器和 GeneFiX™ 唾液收集套件中。唾液标本在 4 小时内处理并测试 SARS-CoV-2 基因(E、RdRP 和 N2),并将结果与​​配对 NPS RT-PCR 进行比较以提高诊断准确性。

结果

大多数旅行者没有症状 (75·0%),平均年龄为 34·26 岁。77 名旅行者在住院时 RT-PCR 呈阳性,而 3 名旅行者有阳性接触者。在该组中,NPS、全唾液和 GeneFiX™ 对 SARS-CoV-2 的检出率相当(89·3%,50/56;87·8%,43/49;89·6%,43/ 48). 两种唾液收集方法非常一致 (Kappa = 0·69)。唾液检出率与NPS检出率无统计学差异(p > 0·05)。N2 基因的检测最高,而 E 基因的病毒载量最高(平均值 = 27·96 至 30·10,SD = 3·14 至 3·85)。唾液标本具有高灵敏度(80·4%)和特异性(90·0%),对 SARS-CoV-2 诊断的阳性预测值为 91·8%。

结论

用于 SARS-CoV-2 筛查的唾液是一种与 NPS RT-PCR 相当的简单准确的技术。

更新日期:2021-07-24
down
wechat
bug