This paper takes up the challenge set down by the review work of Hess and Sovacool (2020) and Sovacool et al. (2020) and joins the conversation about future research agendas where STS is aligned towards humanities and social science research of energy solutions. We identified two under-representations in these review papers: 1) New materialism and object-oriented ontological (OOO) approaches and 2) how fictive imaginaries develop the link between OOO and public engagement with energy challenges. We propose that ontology of objects and non-human worlds is central to cocreation work in energy research where there exist assemblages of the Anthropocene. We argue that an ethical, engaged, object-oriented ontology that links with fictive imaginaries is crucial whichever direction STS takes in energy research.

本文接受了 Hess 和 Sovacool（2020）以及 Sovacool 等人的审查工作提出的挑战。(2020) 并加入关于未来研究议程的对话，其中 STS 与能源解决方案的人文和社会科学研究保持一致。我们在这些评论论文中发现了两个代表性不足：1) 新唯物主义和面向对象本体论 (OOO) 方法，以及 2) 虚构的想象如何发展 OOO 与公众参与能源挑战之间的联系。我们认为物体和非人类世界的本体论是能源研究中存在人类世组合的共创工作的核心。我们认为，无论 STS 在能源研究中采取哪个方向，与虚构想象相联系的道德的、参与的、面向对象的本体论都是至关重要的。