Mishra et al. (2020) are thankful to Maurya et al. (2021) for raising some basic questions on their work, as it gave the authors an excellent opportunity to validate and support their claim. Maurya et al. (2021) have to understand that Vigodi is a ∼ 5–7 km wide fault zone including Vigodi-Gugriana-Khirasra fault complex, where several NW-SE to NNW-SSE striking faults are clearly visible (for details, refer to Fig. 2 of Mishra et al., 2020). Further, Mishra et al. (2020) would like to emphasize that they have worked on only one segment of Vigodi fault (where they encountered classical evidence of faulting) located between Vigodi and Dayapar and presented the structural data for the same. As specified earlier, Mishra et al. (2020) worked on a branch of fault, and the data collected by them is sufficient for analyzing only a small area. Maurya et al. (2021) have stated that “Two domes, not located along the VF are wrongly analysed”. Here Mishra et al. (2020) would like to emphasize that both the domes are associated with the western branch of the VF zone. In Biswas (1993; Pg. no. 323) these two domes fall under the Vigodi fault zone (amongst the series of domes on the upthrust part of VF).

米什拉等人。(2020) 感谢 Maurya 等人。(2021) 对他们的工作提出了一些基本问题，因为它为作者提供了验证和支持他们的主张的绝佳机会。毛里亚等人。(2021) 必须明白 Vigodi 是一个 5-7 公里宽的断层带，包括 Vigodi-Gugriana-Khirasra 断层复合体，其中几个 NW-SE 到 NNW-SSE 的显着断层清晰可见（详见图 2 Mishra 等人，2020 年）。此外，Mishra 等人。(2020) 想强调，他们只研究了位于 Vigodi 和 Dayapar 之间的 Vigodi 断层的一段（在那里他们遇到了经典的断层证据），并提供了该断层的结构数据。如前所述，Mishra 等人。(2020) 在断层的一个分支上工作，他们收集的数据只够分析一小块区域。毛里亚等人。两个不沿 VF 定位的圆顶被错误地分析”。这里 Mishra 等人。(2020) 想强调的是，这两个圆顶都与 VF 区的西部分支有关。在 Biswas (1993; Pg. no. 323) 中，这两个圆顶属于 Vigodi 断层带（在 VF 上冲部分的一系列圆顶中）。