Two experiments evaluated whether the experience of extinction makes acquisition context specific (EMACS) while the extinction learning itself also becomes context dependent under ABA and ABC renewal designs in a human predictive learning situation. Two groups of participants received X-Outcome pairings in context A followed by P-Outcome pairings in context B. For participants in group E, cue X was then extinguished in context B while cue P was trained. Participants in group NE were trained with P, but they did not have the extinction experience. Testing target cues outside the context B (i.e. the context in which P was trained and X was extinguished) in group E led to an increase in responding to cue X (Renewal effect) and a decrease in responding to cue P (EMACS effect) regardless of whether the test was conducted in context A (Experiment 1) or in an alternative context C (Experiment 2). Combined results suggest that Renewal and EMACS effects may be based on the same underlying mechanism. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

灭绝的同时证据使习得上下文特定以及人类预测学习中的 ABA 和 ABC 更新效应。

两个实验评估了灭绝的经验是否使习得上下文特定（EMACS），而灭绝学习本身在人类预测学习情况下的 ABA 和 ABC 更新设计下也变得依赖于上下文。两组参与者在上下文 A 中接受 X-结果配对，然后在上下文 B 中接受 P-结果配对。对于 E 组的参与者，提示 X 在提示 P 接受训练的同时在上下文 B 中消失。NE组的参与者接受了P的训练，但他们没有灭绝的经历。测试上下文 B 之外的目标提示（即 在 E 组中训练 P 和 X 消失的环境导致对提示 X 的反应增加（更新效应）和对提示 P 的反应减少（EMACS 效应），无论测试是否在上下文 A 中进行（实验 1）或在替代上下文 C（实验 2）中。综合结果表明，更新和 EMACS 效应可能基于相同的潜在机制。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA，保留所有权利）。