Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Pain Training for Respite Workers Supporting Children With Disabilities Part Two: Training Evaluations and the Impact of Training on Knowledge Application.
American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities ( IF 1.9 ) Pub Date : 2021-07-01 , DOI: 10.1352/1944-7558-126.4.289
Lara M Genik 1 , Elisabeth L Aerts 1 , Hiba Nauman 1 , Chantel C Barney 2 , Stephen P Lewis 3 , C Meghan McMurtry 1
Affiliation  

Within a parallel-group randomized control trial, pain training's impact on Respite Workers' (RW) care approaches and training evaluations was explored. RW (n = 158) from 14 organizations received pain or control training following randomization. Researchers were blind until randomization; allocations were not shared explicitly with organizations/participants. Participants completed a strategy use questionnaire immediately before and an evaluation immediately after training completion. Four-to-6 weeks later, participants completed the strategy use questionnaire and semistructured focus groups. No differences in pain approaches were noted in strategy use questionnaires. Per focus groups, both groups acquired a "knowing" about pain and applied pain-related care approaches in similarly. Pain training participants identified need for "growing and strengthening" pain knowledge. Training endorsements were favorable. RW pain training has value and may impact practice.

中文翻译:

一项随机对照试验评估为残疾儿童提供支持的临时工人的疼痛培训第二部分:培训评估和培训对知识应用的影响。

在平行组随机对照试验中,探讨了疼痛训练对暂息工作者 (RW) 护理方法和培训评估的影响。来自 14 个组织的 RW (n = 158) 在随机化后接受了疼痛或控制训练。研究人员在随机化之前是盲目的;分配没有明确与组织/参与者共享。参与者在培训结束前立即完成了策略使用问卷调查,并在培训结束后立即完成了评估。四到六周后,参与者完成了策略使用问卷和半结构化焦点小组。在策略使用问卷中没有注意到疼痛方法的差异。每个焦点小组,两个小组都获得了对疼痛的“了解”,并以类似的方式应用了与疼痛相关的护理方法。疼痛培训参与者确定需要“增长和加强”疼痛知识。培训认可是有利的。RW 疼痛训练具有价值,可能会影响实践。
更新日期:2021-07-01
down
wechat
bug