当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparing recidivism rates among domestically violent men enrolled in ACTV versus Duluth/CBT.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology ( IF 4.5 ) Pub Date : 2021-05-01 , DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000649
Erika Lawrence 1 , Callie Mazurek 1 , Kathleen W Reardon 1
Affiliation  

Objective: The goal of the present study was to replicate and extend published preliminary evidence demonstrating that a relatively new treatment (Achieving Change through Value-Based Behavior [ACTV]) for men convicted of domestic violence significantly reduces recidivism compared to the standard treatment offered across the United States (the Duluth Model and/or cognitive-behavioral approaches). Method: Men convicted of domestic assault (DA) and court-mandated to a Batterers Intervention Program [N = 725; Mage = 34.9 years (SDage = 10.37 years)] were assigned to attend ACTV or treatment-as-usual (TAU). Participants were predominantly Black (63.3%). Recidivism, defined as any new convictions, any violent convictions, and any DA convictions, was examined up to 5 years posttreatment. Only men classified as medium or high risk were included. Results: Men in TAU were more likely to receive any conviction (95% CI [1.61, 4.40]), a violent conviction (95% CI [1.67, 9.60]), and a DA conviction (95% CI [1.36, 4.90]) compared to men in ACTV. Time to new conviction posttreatment was shorter for men in TAU versus ACTV (95% CI [2.16, 4.11]). Finally, the risk of receiving any new conviction (95% CI [1.46, 7.11]) was more strongly associated with noncompletion for TAU than ACTV participants. Conclusions: ACTV shows great promise for reducing recidivism compared to TAU. The present study represents the first time this intervention has been implemented in a state other than where it was developed and provides initial evidence for its generalizability and robustness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译:

比较参加 ACTV 与德卢斯 / CBT 的家庭暴力男性的再犯率。

目标:本研究的目标是复制和扩展已发表的初步证据,证明相对于全国范围内提供的标准治疗,对被判犯有家庭暴力罪的男性而言,一种相对较新的治疗方法(通过基于价值的行为实现改变 [ACTV])显着减少了累犯。美国(德卢斯模型和/或认知行为方法)。方法:被判犯有家庭攻击罪 (DA) 并被法院强制执行殴打者干预计划的男子 [N = 725;Mage = 34.9 岁 (SDage = 10.37 岁)] 被分配参加 ACTV 或照常治疗 (TAU)。参与者主要是黑人 (63.3%)。累犯,定义为任何新的定罪、任何暴力定罪和任何 DA 定罪,在治疗后长达 5 年进行检查。仅包括被归类为中风险或高风险的男性。结果:相比之下,TAU 中的男性更有可能被定罪(95% CI [1.61, 4.40])、暴力定罪(95% CI [1.67, 9.60])和 DA 定罪(95% CI [1.36, 4.90])对 ACTV 中的男性。与 ACTV 相比,TAU 男性的新定罪后治疗时间更短(95% CI [2.16, 4.11])。最后,与 ACTV 参与者相比,接受任何新定罪的风险(95% CI [1.46, 7.11])与未完成 TAU 的相关性更强。结论:与 TAU 相比,ACTV 显示出减少再犯的巨大希望。本研究是该干预措施首次在其开发地以外的州实施,并为其普遍性和稳健性提供了初步证据。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA,保留所有权利)。与 ACTV 中的男性相比,暴力定罪(95% CI [1.67, 9.60])和 DA 定罪(95% CI [1.36, 4.90])。与 ACTV 相比,TAU 男性的新定罪后治疗时间更短(95% CI [2.16, 4.11])。最后,与 ACTV 参与者相比,接受任何新定罪的风险(95% CI [1.46, 7.11])与未完成 TAU 的相关性更强。结论:与 TAU 相比,ACTV 显示出减少再犯的巨大希望。本研究是该干预措施首次在其开发地以外的州实施,并为其普遍性和稳健性提供了初步证据。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA,保留所有权利)。与 ACTV 中的男性相比,暴力定罪(95% CI [1.67, 9.60])和 DA 定罪(95% CI [1.36, 4.90])。与 ACTV 相比,TAU 男性的新定罪后治疗时间更短(95% CI [2.16, 4.11])。最后,与 ACTV 参与者相比,接受任何新定罪的风险(95% CI [1.46, 7.11])与未完成 TAU 的相关性更强。结论:与 TAU 相比,ACTV 显示出减少再犯的巨大希望。本研究是该干预措施首次在其开发地以外的州实施,并为其普遍性和稳健性提供了初步证据。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA,保留所有权利)。与 ACTV 相比,TAU 男性的新定罪后治疗时间更短(95% CI [2.16, 4.11])。最后,与 ACTV 参与者相比,接受任何新定罪的风险(95% CI [1.46, 7.11])与未完成 TAU 的相关性更强。结论:与 TAU 相比,ACTV 显示出减少再犯的巨大希望。本研究是该干预措施首次在其开发地以外的州实施,并为其普遍性和稳健性提供了初步证据。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA,保留所有权利)。与 ACTV 相比,TAU 男性的新定罪后治疗时间更短(95% CI [2.16, 4.11])。最后,与 ACTV 参与者相比,接受任何新定罪的风险(95% CI [1.46, 7.11])与未完成 TAU 的相关性更强。结论:与 TAU 相比,ACTV 显示出减少再犯的巨大希望。本研究是该干预措施首次在其开发地以外的州实施,并为其普遍性和稳健性提供了初步证据。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA,保留所有权利)。与 TAU 相比,ACTV 显示出减少再犯的巨大希望。本研究是该干预措施首次在其开发地以外的州实施,并为其普遍性和稳健性提供了初步证据。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA,保留所有权利)。与 TAU 相比,ACTV 显示出减少再犯的巨大希望。本研究是该干预措施首次在其开发地以外的州实施,并为其普遍性和稳健性提供了初步证据。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2021-05-01
down
wechat
bug