Building on the conceptual foundation of articles published in the 2005 volume of the Journal of Counseling Psychology on the qualitative turn in Counseling Psychology, we write to introduce and reflect on Critical Participatory Action Research (CPAR) as an intersectional approach to knowledge production by psychologists researching alongside individuals, communities, and movements dedicated to social justice. We open with a brief review of the origins of CPAR and the epistemological commitments of this approach to inquiry. We then explore why and how participation matters, and the delicate dynamics of CPAR through various phases of research: putting together a research team, crafting research questions and design, selecting methods, sampling, participatory analyses of qualitative and quantitative material, and figuring out how to produce and circulate findings in ways accountable to the community/movement of interest. The second half of the article offers a slow journey into one CPAR project, What's Your Issue?, a multigenerational, national, participatory survey designed by and for LGBTQIA+ youth, with an emphasis on the participation and representation of youth of color. We write this article for scholars, practitioners, activists, educators, and students to make visible why participation is so crucial to social justice research; that "no research on us, without us" is both scientifically and ethically valid, and how mixed methods research with LGBTQIA+ and gender-expansive youth can open new horizons for theory, methods, and action. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

批判性参与行动研究：交叉知识生产的方法和实践。

基于在 2005 年《咨询心理学杂志》上发表的关于咨询心理学定性转变的文章的概念基础，我们写信介绍和反思批判性参与行动研究 (CPAR) 作为心理学家研究知识生产的一种交叉方法。与致力于社会正义的个人、社区和运动一起。我们首先简要回顾 CPAR 的起源以及这种探究方法的认识论承诺。然后，我们通过研究的各个阶段探索参与的原因和方式，以及 CPAR 的微妙动态：组建研究团队，制定研究问题和设计，选择方法，抽样，定性和定量材料的参与式分析，并弄清楚如何以对社区/利益运动负责的方式产生和传播调查结果。本文的后半部分介绍了一个 CPAR 项目“你的问题是什么？”的缓慢旅程，这是一项由 LGBTQIA+ 青年设计并为他们设计的多代、全国性的参与式调查，重点是有色人种青年的参与和代表。我们为学者、从业者、活动家、教育家和学生撰写这篇文章，以阐明为什么参与对社会正义研究如此重要；“没有我们，就没有对我们的研究”在科学和伦理上都是有效的，以及 LGBTQIA+ 和性别扩张青年的混合方法研究如何为理论、方法和行动开辟新的视野。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA，保留所有权利）。