Social scientists are increasingly interested in methodological advances that can illuminate the distinct experiences and health outcomes produced by various systems of inequality (e.g., race, gender, religion, sexual orientation). However, innovative methodological strategies are needed to (a) capture the breadth, complexity, and dynamic nature of moments co-constructed by multiple axes of power and oppression (i.e., intersectional experiences) and (b) keep pace with the increasing interest in testing links between such events and health among underresearched groups. Mixed methods designs may be particularly well suited for these needs, but are seldom adopted. In light of this, we describe a new mixed methods experience sampling approach that can aid researchers in detecting and understanding intersectional experiences, as well as testing their day-to-day associations with aspects of health. Drawn from two separate experience sampling studies examining day-to-day links between intersectional experiences and psychological health-one focusing on Black American LGBQ individuals and another on Muslim American LGBQ individuals-we provide quantitative and qualitative data examples to illustrate how mixed methods investigations can advance the assessment, interpretation, and analysis of everyday experiences constructed by multiple systems of power. Limitations, possible future adaptations, implications for research, and relevance to the clinical context are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

交叉经验：混合方法经验抽样方法来研究难以捉摸的现象。

社会科学家对方法论的进步越来越感兴趣，这些方法论可以阐明各种不平等制度（例如，种族、性别、宗教、性取向）产生的不同经历和健康结果。然而，需要创新的方法论策略来 (a) 捕捉由多个权力和压迫轴（即交叉经验）共同构建的时刻的广度、复杂性和动态性质，以及 (b) 跟上对测试日益增长的兴趣这些事件与研究不足的群体之间的健康之间的联系。混合方法设计可能特别适合这些需求，但很少被采用。鉴于此，我们描述了一种新的混合方法体验抽样方法，可以帮助研究人员检测和理解交叉体验，以及测试他们与健康方面的日常联系。从两个独立的经验抽样研究中得出，这些研究检查了交叉经验与心理健康之间的日常联系——一个关注美国黑人 LGBQ 个体，另一个关注穆斯林美国 LGBQ 个体——我们提供了定量和定性数据示例来说明混合方法调查如何能够推进对由多个权力系统构建的日常经验的评估、解释和分析。讨论了局限性、未来可能的调整、对研究的影响以及与临床背景的相关性。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA，保留所有权利）。从两个独立的经验抽样研究中得出，这些研究检查了交叉经验与心理健康之间的日常联系——一个关注美国黑人 LGBQ 个体，另一个关注穆斯林美国 LGBQ 个体——我们提供了定量和定性数据示例来说明混合方法调查如何能够推进对由多个权力系统构建的日常经验的评估、解释和分析。讨论了局限性、未来可能的调整、对研究的影响以及与临床背景的相关性。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA，保留所有权利）。从两个独立的经验抽样研究中得出，这些研究检查了交叉经验与心理健康之间的日常联系——一个关注美国黑人 LGBQ 个体，另一个关注穆斯林美国 LGBQ 个体——我们提供了定量和定性数据示例来说明混合方法调查如何能够推进对由多个权力系统构建的日常经验的评估、解释和分析。讨论了局限性、未来可能的调整、对研究的影响以及与临床背景的相关性。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2021 APA，保留所有权利）。