当前位置: X-MOL 学术Crop Prot. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Mixing the correct nitrogen source and rate with 2,4-D increases efficacy in hard and soft water
Crop Protection ( IF 2.5 ) Pub Date : 2021-07-17 , DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105758
Geoffrey P. Schortgen 1 , Aaron J. Patton 2
Affiliation  

Hard water antagonism of 2,4-D dimethylamine (DMA) is avoided with the inclusion of ammonium sulfate (AMS) as a water conditioning agent in mixtures. In addition to functioning as an adjuvant, AMS is also a nitrogen (N) fertilizer. Two experiments evaluated the efficacy of 2,4-D DMA when mixed with alternative N sources and rates. The first experiment sought to determine the influence of alternative N sources and N rates on 2,4-D DMA efficacy in comparison to AMS. The second experiment more closely evaluated the influence of AMS rate on 2,4-D DMA efficacy. Nitrogen sources included AMS, ammonium nitrate (AMN), potassium nitrate (KNO3), urea–ammonium–nitrate (UAN), and urea. Each N source was tank-mixed with 2,4-D at both an adjuvant rate (20 g L−1 or 25 ml L−1) and a fertilizer rate (24.4 kg N ha−1) in both soft (0 mg CaCO3 L−1) and hard (600 mg CaCO3 L−1) water. Efficacy of the mixtures was assessed on dandelion (Taraxacum officinale F.H. Wigg.) in the greenhouse. Without consideration to water hardness level or N rate, 2,4-D DMA efficacy with the N sources was: AMN = UAN > AMS = Urea > KNO3. Ammonium sulfate reversed hard water antagonism of 2,4-D DMA at the adjuvant rate, but not at the fertilizer rate. When applied at the adjuvant rate in hard water, dandelion control rankings from 2,4-D mixes were generally: AMN = UAN = AMS > Urea > KNO3. It is not advised to mix KNO3 with 2,4-D applications based on reduced efficacy. The second experiment determined that 2,4-D efficacy decreased as AMS rate increased above the commonly used adjuvant rate (2% w/w, 20 g L−1), likely from salting out. Applicators desiring to use AMS as a foliar fertilizer should apply AMS separate from 2,4-D DMA to prevent potential antagonism.



中文翻译:

将正确的氮源和速率与 2,4-D 混合可提高在硬水中和软水中的功效

通过在混合物中加入硫酸铵 (AMS) 作为水调节剂,避免了 2,4-D 二甲胺 (DMA) 的硬水拮抗作用。除了用作佐剂外,AMS 还是一种氮 (N) 肥料。两个实验评估了 2,4-D DMA 在与替代氮源和比率混合时的功效。第一个实验旨在确定与 AMS 相比,替代氮源和氮率对 2,4-D DMA 功效的影响。第二个实验更密切地评估了 AMS 速率对 2,4-D DMA 功效的影响。氮源包括 AMS、硝酸铵 (AMN)、硝酸钾 (KNO 3 )、尿素-硝酸铵 (UAN) 和尿素。每个 N 源都与 2,4-D 以两种佐剂比率(20 g L -1或 25 ml L -1) 和施肥量 (24.4 kg N ha -1 ) 在软水 (0 mg CaCO 3 L -1 ) 和硬水 (600 mg CaCO 3 L -1 ) 中。在温室中对蒲公英(Taraxacum officinale FH Wigg.)评估混合物的功效。不考虑水硬度水平或 N 率,N 源的 2,4-D DMA 功效为:AMN = UAN > AMS = 尿素 > KNO 3。硫酸铵在助剂用量下逆转了 2,4-D DMA 的硬水拮抗作用,但在肥料用量下则不然。当在硬水中以佐剂比例施用时,来自 2,4-D 混合物的蒲公英控制等级通常为:AMN = UAN = AMS > 尿素 > KNO 3。不建议混合 KNO 3与基于降低的功效的 2,4-D 应用。第二个实验确定,2,4-D 功效随着 AMS 率增加到高于常用佐剂率(2% w/w,20 g L -1)而降低,可能是由于盐析。希望使用 AMS 作为叶面肥的施药者应将 AMS 与 2,4-D DMA 分开使用,以防止潜在的拮抗作用。

更新日期:2021-07-21
down
wechat
bug