Abstract:In "Transgender Studies: Queer Theory's Evil Twin," part of the 2004 forum "Thinking Sex/Thinking Gender," Susan Stryker underlined a critical way in which trans people had become exceptionalized by a certain strand of queer theory, serving as figures for the antibinary subversion of gender that left sexual subjectivity off the hook in accounting for itself as a default cis category. This abstraction into figuration was, precisely, a turning away from how Stryker had earlier theorized the queerness of gender and transness through the lens of her embodied knowledge and affect. Reading Stryker's mobilization of rage in a wider history of trans women and trans women of color's critiques of queer movements, we argue for the continued promise of Stryker's critique in producing knowledge around the queerness of gender directly out of the material, embodied livelihood of trans people.

中文翻译：

---

跨批评的承诺

摘要：在 2004 年论坛“思考性/思考性别”的一部分“跨性别研究：酷儿理论的邪恶双胞胎”中，苏珊·史崔克强调了一种批判方式，在这种方式中，跨性别者因某种酷儿理论而变得例外，充当人物对于性别的反二元颠覆，将性主体性排除在外，将其自身视为默认的顺式类别。准确地说，这种对形象的抽象与 Stryker 早先通过她具体化的知识和情感的视角对性别和变性的奇怪性进行理论化的方式不同。阅读史赛克在更广泛的跨性别女性和跨性别女性对酷儿运动批判的历史中的愤怒动员，我们主张史赛克的持续承诺”