New books by Roderick A. Ferguson, David K. Johnson, and Guy Davidson prompt readers to reassess Stonewall as both a significant event and a pivotal concept for queer scholarship. Ferguson aims to fit queer liberation into the vocabulary of intersectional politics by emphasizing Stonewall’s radical origins. Johnson reads Stonewall’s bourgeois preconditions in the contributions the physique entrepreneurs made to gay community networks by publishing magazines featuring nearly naked men and running adjacent ads for businesses, including photography studios, mailorder catalogues, book clubs, and penpal services aimed at gay consumers. Despite their different politics, for both Ferguson and Johnson, Stonewall remains a historical turning point, an event that organizes beforeandafter narratives and infuses them with rhetorical, affective, and political energies. To rediscover aspects of Stonewall or unearth new details about it, both Ferguson and Johnson assume its historicity. It remains a reference point for mea-

中文翻译：

---

石墙的另一面

Roderick A. Ferguson、David K. Johnson 和 Guy Davidson 的新书促使读者重新评估石墙，它既是一个重要事件，也是酷儿学术研究的关键概念。弗格森旨在通过强调斯通沃尔的激进起源，将酷儿解放融入交叉政治的词汇中。约翰逊通过出版以近乎裸男为特色的杂志和为企业投放相邻广告，包括摄影工作室、邮购目录、读书俱乐部和针对同性恋消费者的笔友服务，解读了斯通沃尔对同性恋社区网络所做贡献的资产阶级先决条件。尽管他们的政治不同，但对弗格森和约翰逊来说，石墙仍然是一个历史转折点，一个组织前后叙事的事件，并为它们注入修辞、情感、和政治能量。为了重新发现石墙的各个方面或发掘有关它的新细节，弗格森和约翰逊都假设它的历史性。它仍然是测量的参考点