Analysis of proportionality in the context of Article 5 TEU after the PSPP judgment – Bundesverfassungsgericht challenging Court of Justice to control European Central Bank’s motives – Doctrinal tradition of ‘smoking out’ illicit motives through proportionality – Article 5(4) TEU: proportionality of exercise of competences, primarily safeguarding member states’ autonomy – Court of Justice case law on proportionality: deferential standard of review towards measures of EU institutions – Bundesverfassungsgericht case law on federal competences and municipal autonomy: less deferential but still respectful standard of review – PSPP inconsistent with case law and with Article 5 TEU – Balancing-stage of proportionality unsuitable for motive control

中文翻译：

---

平衡能力？在德国联邦法院的 PSPP 判决后，比例性作为规范权限行使的工具

在第 5 条 TEU 的背景下的相称性分析聚苯乙烯判决 – Bundesverfassungsgericht 挑战法院控制欧洲中央银行的动机 – 通过相称性“排除”非法动机的教义传统 – 第 5(4) 条 TEU：相称性锻炼管辖权，主要保障成员国的自治权 – 法院关于相称性的判例法：对欧盟机构措施的审查尊重标准 – 关于联邦管辖权和市政自治权的联邦法院判例法：不那么顺从但仍然尊重审查标准 –聚苯乙烯不符合判例法和 TEU 第 5 条 – 不适合动机控制的比例平衡阶段