Tertiary education has a vital role to play in fostering social mobility. To assess the extent to which Australian universities enrol disadvantaged students, I use two measures of disadvantage: neighbourhood characteristics and individual characteristics, and compare higher education institutions. Neighbourhood metrics appear to be a poor proxy for individual disadvantage. Yet even so, some institutions stand out as more effective pathways for disadvantaged students. I conclude with some recommendations for improving data quality, education policy and evaluation in order to make Australian universities more effective engines of social mobility.

中文翻译：

---

澳大利亚流动性成绩单：哪些大学录取最弱势学生？

高等教育在促进社会流动方面发挥着至关重要的作用。为了评估澳大利亚大学招收弱势学生的程度，我使用了两种劣势衡量标准：邻里特征和个人特征，并比较了高等教育机构。邻里指标似乎不能很好地代表个人劣势。然而，即便如此，一些机构还是脱颖而出，成为弱势学生的更有效途径。最后，我提出了一些改善数据质量、教育政策和评估的建议，以使澳大利亚大学成为更有效的社会流动引擎。