have been to cast this work as a road map for establishing auxiliary and supplemental supports for community college students through auxiliary partnerships with groups like TF. In this way, the authors could propose meaningful change while circumventing, if not breaking, the grip of “institutional inertia” and without challenging— even implicitly—the traditional curriculum of community colleges. An overarching argument the authors are making in TLCC is summed up late in the book:

中文翻译：

---

书评：过上有动力的生活：回忆录和活动

一直将这项工作作为路线图，通过与 TF 等团体的辅助伙伴关系为社区大学生建立辅助和补充支持。通过这种方式，作者可以提出有意义的变革，同时规避（如果不是打破）“制度惯性”的束缚，并且不会挑战——甚至是含蓄地——社区大学的传统课程。作者在 TLCC 中提出的一个总体论点在本书的后面进行了总结：