Neurotechnologies can pose a threat to people's privacy and mental integrity. Hence the proposal of establishing neurorights (Ienca and Andorno, 2017) and technical principles for the implementation of these rights (Lavazza, 2018). However, concepts such as ‘the extended mind’ and what might be called ‘the post-human objection’ can be said to challenge this protection paradigm. On the one hand, it may be difficult to outline the cognitive boundaries between humans and machines (with the consequent ethical and legal implications). On the other hand, those who wish to make strong use of neurotechnologies, or even hybridize with them, reject the idea that privacy and mental integrity should be protected. However, from the latter view, issues may arise relating to the protection of persons entering into relationships with posthumanist people. This article will discuss these scenarios as well as the ethical, legal, social, and political issues that could follow from them.

中文翻译：

---

对于那些不能或不想免受神经技术威胁的人我们应该做什么？

神经技术可能对人们的隐私和精神完整性构成威胁。因此提出了建立神经权利的提议（Ienca 和 Andorno，2017 年）以及实施这些权利的技术原则（Lavazza，2018 年）。然而，诸如“扩展思维”和所谓“后人类反对”等概念可以说是对这种保护范式的挑战。一方面，可能很难勾勒出人类和机器之间的认知界限（以及随之而来的道德和法律影响）。另一方面，那些希望大力利用神经技术，甚至与神经技术混合的人，拒绝保护隐私和精神完整性的想法。然而，从后一种观点来看，可能会出现与保护与后人类主义人士建立关系的人有关的问题。本文将讨论这些场景以及由此可能产生的道德、法律、社会和政治问题。