Mikel Burley rightly complains about the parochialism of most philosophy of religion, joining a growing chorus of voices calling for this field to live up to its name by providing critical analyses of religion, not only Christian doctrine. Expanding the content of this subdiscipline to include a greater variety of religions is no mean task, however, as it raises complex questions about the very nature of the field. What are the proper aims and methodology of philosophy of religion? What range of expertise should scholars within this field possess? What even constitutes its subject matter—“religion”—as distinct from other topics within philosophy, such as metaphysics and ethics? Burley is to be commended for having waded into this difficult terrain to offer a comprehensive and well-illustrated proposal about the possible shape of a genuinely globalized philosophy of religion. In the course of his argument, he criticizes the inadequacies of some past attempts to promote pluralism within philosophy of religion, including the well-known position of the late John Hick.

中文翻译：

---

描述性与神学多元主义

米克尔·伯利 (Mikel Burley) 正确地抱怨了大多数宗教哲学的狭隘主义，加入了越来越多的声音，呼吁该领域通过提供对宗教的批判性分析来名副其实，不仅是基督教教义。然而，将这一分支学科的内容扩展到包括更多种类的宗教并非易事，因为它提出了有关该领域本质的复杂问题。宗教哲学的正确目标和方法论是什么？该领域的学者应具备哪些专业知识？甚至是什么构成了它的主题——“宗教”——与哲学中的其他主题（如形而上学和伦理学）不同？伯利涉足这个艰难的领域，就真正全球化的宗教哲学的可能形态提出了一个全面而详尽的建议，这一点值得称赞。在他的论证过程中，他批评了过去在宗教哲学中促进多元化的一些尝试的不足之处，