当前位置: X-MOL 学术3D Print. Addit. Manuf. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Productivity Comparison Between Vat Polymerization and Fused Filament Fabrication Methods for Additive Manufacturing of Polymers
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing ( IF 3.1 ) Pub Date : 2021-07-12 , DOI: 10.1089/3dp.2021.0009
Dominik Muenks 1 , Yordan Kyosev 1
Affiliation  

Many users relate additive manufacturing (AM) directly with fast and high-quality prototyping and manufacturing. Nevertheless, already within the different printing techniques there are significant printing time differences for the same polymer printed objects. For AM, there are currently two main known methods to three-dimensional (3D) print objects: One is the vat polymerization process using liquid crystal display (LCD) polymerization, also known as masked stereolithography (MSLA). The other is material extrusion, known as fused filament fabrication (FFF) or fused deposition modeling. Both processes can be found in the private sector (desktop printers) or in industry. The FFF and MSLA processes apply material layer by layer to 3D print objects, but both processes are different in their printing techniques. The different printing methods result in different printing speeds for the same 3D printed object. Geometry models are used to investigate which design elements affect the printing speed without changing the actual printing parameters. Support and infill are also taken into account. The influencing factors will be shown to optimize the printing time. With the assistance of the different slicer software, the influence factors were calculated and the different variants are pointed out. The determined correlations help to find the suitable printing technique to make optimum use of the printing performance of both technologies.

中文翻译:

用于聚合物增材制造的大桶聚合和熔丝制造方法的生产率比较

许多用户将增材制造 (AM) 直接与快速、高质量的原型制作和制造联系起来。然而,在不同的打印技术中,相同的聚合物打印对象已经存在显着的打印时间差异。对于 AM,目前有两种主要的三维 (3D) 打印对象的已知方法:一种是使用液晶显示器 (LCD) 聚合的桶聚合工艺,也称为掩模立体光刻 (MSLA)。另一种是材料挤压,称为熔丝制造 (FFF) 或熔融沉积建模。这两个过程都可以在私营部门(桌面打印机)或工业中找到。FFF 和 MSLA 工艺将材料逐层应用于 3D 打印对象,但这两种工艺在打印技术上有所不同。不同的打印方法导致同一 3D 打印对象的打印速度不同。几何模型用于在不改变实际打印参数的情况下研究哪些设计元素会影响打印速度。支撑和填充也被考虑在内。将显示影响因素以优化打印时间。在不同切片软件的帮助下,计算了影响因素并指出了不同的变体。确定的相关性有助于找到合适的印刷技术,以最佳地利用这两种技术的印刷性能。支撑和填充也被考虑在内。将显示影响因素以优化打印时间。在不同切片软件的帮助下,计算了影响因素并指出了不同的变体。确定的相关性有助于找到合适的印刷技术,以最佳地利用这两种技术的印刷性能。支撑和填充也被考虑在内。将显示影响因素以优化打印时间。在不同切片软件的帮助下,计算了影响因素并指出了不同的变体。确定的相关性有助于找到合适的印刷技术,以最佳地利用这两种技术的印刷性能。
更新日期:2021-07-13
down
wechat
bug