ABSTRACT

Around 1900, historiography of philosophy faced the challenge of opening itself to scientific, social, and cultural history, without giving up what is unique to philosophy: its exclusive claim to integrate systematic philosophy and history of philosophy. This paper focuses on the theoretical reflections of the historian of philosophy Nicolai Hartmann, who gave a coherent response to this problem-situation and integrated influences from the historiography of philosophy of Marburg Neo-Kantianism and the approaches of Wilhelm Dilthey and Wilhelm Windelband. The paper reconstructs the situation in which advanced historiography of philosophy found itself around 1900, presents Hartmann’s approach and demonstrates its continuing relevance to contemporary discussions on the relationship of philosophy to its history.

摘要

1900 年左右，哲学史学面临着向科学、社会和文化史开放自己的挑战，但又不放弃哲学的独特之处：它独有的整合系统哲学和哲学史的主张。本文着眼于哲学史学家尼古拉·哈特曼(Nicolai Hartmann)的理论反思，他对这一问题作出了连贯的回应，并综合了马尔堡新康德主义哲学史学和威廉·狄尔泰和威廉·温德尔班德的方法的影响。该论文重建了 1900 年左右高级哲学史学所处的境遇，展示了哈特曼的方法，并展示了它与当代关于哲学与其历史关系的讨论的持续相关性。