The correlation between the philosophies of Vladimir Solovyov and Lev Shestov is a rich research theme. Despite the fact that Solovyov has been strongly criticised by Shestov, recent studies show that the two philosophers have much in common. The aim of this article is to analyse the correlation between the two main concepts propounded by Solovyov and Shestov: All-Unity and self-will. This article argues that both concepts are actually expressions of ultimate freedom, which is achieved when one is saved from primordial sin. Although the two philosophers refer to primordial sin using different terms and suggest different ways of achieving salvation, they are actually moving in the same direction. In other words, Solovyov and Shestov speak about the same concept but emphasise different aspects of it. Solovyov describes the state of freedom in terms of ontology, while Shestov uses epistemological (gnoseological) terminology for the same purpose. Thus, the two doctrines move in the same direction but in different ways.

弗拉基米尔·索洛维约夫 (Vladimir Solovyov) 和列夫·舍斯托夫 (Lev Shestov) 的哲学之间的相关性是一个丰富的研究主题。尽管索洛维约夫受到舍斯托夫的强烈批评，但最近的研究表明，这两位哲学家有很多共同之处。本文旨在分析索洛维约夫和舍斯托夫提出的两个主要概念：全团结和自我意志之间的相关性。这篇文章认为，这两个概念实际上都是终极自由的表达，当一个人从原罪中得救时就可以实现。尽管这两位哲学家使用不同的术语来指称原罪，并提出了不同的获得救赎的方法，但他们实际上是朝着同一个方向前进的。换句话说，Solovyov 和 Shestov 谈论的是同一个概念，但强调了它的不同方面。Solovyov 用本体论来描述自由状态，而 Shestov 出于同样的目的使用认识论（gnoseological）术语。因此，这两种学说朝着相同的方向但以不同的方式发展。