Strategy-as-practice (SAP) has become one of the most vibrant areas of contemporary strategy research in the past two decades. As the field has grown significantly, we have witnessed an emergence of distinct streams of research within the SAP research community. Thus, it is time to take stock of this body of work to better understand the structure of the field and provide a refreshed agenda for future research. Our review is based on bibliometric analysis and a systematic review of 340 articles. As a result, we identify the following six clusters of research: praxis, sensemaking, discourse, sociomateriality, institutional and process. Co-citation analysis shows significant disconnects between some of these clusters. Building on our review, we identify various ‘crossing strategies’ for connecting across four disconnects: (i) micro and macro; (ii) sociomaterial and discourse; (iii) critical and more mainstream; and (iv) practice and process perspectives. By harnessing diversity, these crossing strategies suggest rich agendas for future SAP research, ranging from digitalization to gender inequality.

中文翻译：

---

建立联系：利用战略实践研究的多样性

战略实践（SAP）已成为过去二十年来当代战略研究中最活跃的领域之一。随着该领域的显着发展，我们见证了 SAP 研究社区内出现了不同的研究流。因此，是时候对这些工作进行评估，以更好地了解该领域的结构并为未来的研究提供更新的议程。我们的审查基于文献计量分析和对 340 篇文章的系统审查。因此，我们确定了以下六个研究集群：实践、意义建构、话语、社会物质性、制度和过程。共被引分析显示其中一些集群之间存在显着的脱节。基于我们的审查，我们确定了各种“交叉策略”，用于跨越四个断开连接：(i) 微观和宏观；(ii) 社会材料和话语；(iii) 批判性的和更主流的；(iv) 实践和过程观点。通过利用多样性，这些交叉策略为未来的 SAP 研究提出了丰富的议程，从数字化到性别不平等。