当前位置: X-MOL 学术The Journal of Architecture › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Constructing ‘the School of the Ticino’: the historiography of a new Swiss architecture, 1975–1990
The Journal of Architecture ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-11-16 , DOI: 10.1080/13602365.2020.1849357
Irina Davidovici 1
Affiliation  

Architecture in Ticino, Switzerland’s southernmost, Italian-speaking canton, became the subject of fervent historiographic debates in the mid 1970s. With the exhibition ‘Tendenzen: Neuere Architektur im Tessin’, Northern Swiss critic Martin Steinmann placed recent architectural production in the theoretical framework of realism and autonomy. The exhibition and its catalogue attracted national and international attention, leading to the extensive coverage of Ticinese architecture in archithese, A+U, and L’Architecture d’Aujourd’hui. In 1978, Kenneth Frampton subsumed this built production under a nominal ‘Ticino School’; he later used it to illustrate the notion of critical regionalism as ‘an architecture of resistance’. This article argues that such theoretical framings gradually detached the architecture of Ticino from its local context, leading to the paradoxical divergence of its historiography from its history. The resulting historiography entwined four distinct narratives. Their analysis outlines the misalignment of theoretical readings and situated knowledge. Statements of local witnesses, such as those of historian Virgilio Gilardoni and architect Paolo Fumagalli, are newly integrated into the discourse as a corrective to the admittedly better known external projections. The historiography of the ‘new’ Ticinese architecture played a dual role. Not only did it frame a ‘myth’ for international consumption throughout the 1970s and 1980s, but it also constructed a methodological blueprint for Swiss architecture in the 1990s and beyond.

中文翻译:

构建“提契诺学校”:1975-1990 年瑞士新建筑的历史编纂

1970 年代中期,瑞士最南端的意大利语州提契诺州的建筑成为了激烈的史学辩论的主题。在“Tendenzen:Neuere Architektur im Tessin”展览中,瑞士北部评论家马丁·斯坦曼将近期的建筑作品置于现实主义和自治的理论框架中。展览及其目录吸引了国内外的关注,从而在architese、A+U 和L'Architecture d'Aujourd'hui 中广泛覆盖了提契斯建筑。1978 年,肯尼斯·弗兰普顿 (Kenneth Frampton) 将这栋建筑归入名义上的“提契诺学派”之下;他后来用它来说明作为“抵抗建筑”的批判性区域主义的概念。本文认为,这种理论框架逐渐将提契诺州的建筑与其当地环境分离,导致其史学与历史的矛盾分歧。由此产生的历史编纂交织了四种不同的叙述。他们的分析概述了理论阅读和情境知识的错位。当地目击者的陈述,例如历史学家 Virgilio Gilardoni 和建筑师 Paolo Fumagalli 的陈述,被新纳入话语中,作为对公认的更为人所知的外部预测的纠正。“新”提契诺建筑的历史编纂起到了双重作用。它不仅为整个 1970 年代和 1980 年代的国际消费构建了“神话”,而且还为 1990 年代及以后的瑞士建筑构建了方法论蓝图。他们的分析概述了理论阅读和情境知识的错位。当地目击者的陈述,例如历史学家 Virgilio Gilardoni 和建筑师 Paolo Fumagalli 的陈述,被新纳入话语中,作为对公认的更为人所知的外部预测的纠正。“新”提契诺建筑的历史编纂起到了双重作用。它不仅为整个 1970 年代和 1980 年代的国际消费构建了“神话”,而且还为 1990 年代及以后的瑞士建筑构建了方法论蓝图。他们的分析概述了理论阅读和情境知识的错位。当地目击者的陈述,例如历史学家 Virgilio Gilardoni 和建筑师 Paolo Fumagalli 的陈述,被新纳入话语中,作为对公认的更为人所知的外部预测的纠正。“新”提契诺建筑的历史编纂起到了双重作用。它不仅为整个 1970 年代和 1980 年代的国际消费构建了“神话”,而且还为 1990 年代及以后的瑞士建筑构建了方法论蓝图。作为对公认的更广为人知的外部预测的纠正,它们新近融入到话语中。“新”提契诺建筑的历史编纂起到了双重作用。它不仅为整个 1970 年代和 1980 年代的国际消费构建了“神话”,而且还为 1990 年代及以后的瑞士建筑构建了方法论蓝图。作为对公认的更广为人知的外部预测的纠正,它们新近融入到话语中。“新”提契诺建筑的历史编纂起到了双重作用。它不仅为整个 1970 年代和 1980 年代的国际消费构建了“神话”,而且还为 1990 年代及以后的瑞士建筑构建了方法论蓝图。
更新日期:2020-11-16
down
wechat
bug