当前位置: X-MOL 学术Clinical Social Work Journal › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Connecting Loose Ends: Integrating Science into Psychoanalytic Theory
Clinical Social Work Journal ( IF 2.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-19 , DOI: 10.1007/s10615-020-00774-9
Michael Crocker , Art Baur

Freud wanted to be a scientist but fell short of this goal in several ways: first by attempting to make psychoanalysis consistent with Newtonian physics, second by not being rigorous with the scientific method, and finally, by responding to political and social needs. As a result, science did not welcome psychoanalysis into its fold. Fortunately, this is changing. In the years since Freud’s death, two science-based psychoanalytic theories have developed: attachment theory and affect theory. They are both measurable and supported by social psychology, neuroscience, and infant research. We will explore the central importance of affect as well as treatment implications. The work of Bowlby and Tomkins is complementary, and their integration leads to a more complete understanding of psychic phenomena. We will demonstrate how these theorists validate the work of Fairbairn and Winnicott, both of whom remained in the shadow of Freud. Our premise is that the theoretical differences are semantic, based in politics, and that we can bring these theories together should we acknowledge these differences. We will consider how Winnicott’s awareness and sensitivity to parental intrusion should be integrated with attachment theory. In doing so, we want to add to Bowlby’s idea of “secure attachment” and introduce the concepts of “secure enough detachment” and “secure enough attachment”. The former concept appreciates that not all psychic pain comes from abandonment and that privacy and space are profound emotional needs. The latter concept is an effort to move away from absolutistic taxonomy, a shortcoming of attachment theory.



中文翻译:

连接松散的末端:将科学融入精神分析理论

弗洛伊德想成为一名科学家,但在几个方面未能实现这一目标:首先是试图使精神分析与牛顿物理学相一致,其次是对科学方法不严谨,最后是对政治和社会需求的回应。结果,科学不欢迎精神分析加入它的圈子。幸运的是,这种情况正在改变。在弗洛伊德去世后的几年里,两种以科学为基础的精神分析理论已经发展起来:依恋理论和情感理论。它们都是可测量的,并得到社会心理学、神经科学和婴儿研究的支持。我们将探讨影响的核心重要性以及治疗影响。Bowlby 和 Tomkins 的工作是相辅相成的,他们的整合导致对心理现象的更完整的理解。我们将展示这些理论家如何验证费尔贝恩和温尼科特的工作,他们两人都处于弗洛伊德的阴影之下。我们的前提是理论差异是语义上的,基于政治,如果我们承认这些差异,我们可以将这些理论结合在一起。我们将考虑如何将温尼科特对父母入侵的意识和敏感性与依恋理论相结合。在此过程中,我们想在 Bowlby 的“安全附件”概念中加入“安全附件”的概念,并引入“安全附件”的概念。我们将考虑如何将温尼科特对父母入侵的意识和敏感性与依恋理论相结合。在此过程中,我们想在 Bowlby 的“安全附件”概念中加入“安全附件”的概念,并引入“安全附件”的概念。我们将考虑如何将温尼科特对父母入侵的意识和敏感性与依恋理论相结合。在此过程中,我们想在 Bowlby 的“安全附件”概念中加入“安全附件”的概念,并引入“安全附件”的概念。足够的分离”和“足够牢固的依恋”。前一个概念认识到并非所有的精神痛苦都来自被遗弃,而隐私和空间是深刻的情感需求。后一个概念是努力摆脱绝对分类法,这是依恋理论的一个缺点。

更新日期:2020-10-19
down
wechat
bug