Historians of higher education need to consider publishing in non-education history journals [NEHJ’s] to place scholarship, especially for visibility for their research, or remain an isolated research specialization. This examination focuses on the landscape of history journals that publish history of education topics, specifically [NEHJ’s], on an international basis. A case study approach yielded data and, discussion revolves on history of higher education publication uses in four representative case studies: colleges and universities, professors, science, and medicine, to illustrate NEHJ’s and their contribution to history of higher education. Publishing considerations of this scholarly landscape, based on data gathered from various databases will provide the baseline for exploratory discussion of disciplinary cultures as they inform or deform history of higher education published within NEHJ literature. Animated by historiographic, subject, and methodological concerns, this discussion meshes histories of higher education vis-a-vis globalization within the publishing landscape and the transnational turn in scholarship. Journals, geographical and linguistic dispersion, articles and book reviews, are examined, revealing a larger publishing topography for NEHJ journals.

中文翻译：

---

Clio 的非教育历史期刊 (NEHJ)：拓宽高等教育历史期刊出版范围

高等教育历史学家需要考虑在非教育历史期刊 [NEHJ's] 上发表学术论文，特别是为了他们的研究的知名度，或者保持孤立的研究专业。该考试侧重于在国际范围内出版教育史主题的历史期刊，特别是 [NEHJ's]。案例研究方法产生了数据，讨论围绕高等教育出版史在四个代表性案例研究中的使用展开：学院和大学、教授、科学和医学，以说明 NEHJ 及其对高等教育史的贡献。出版对这一学术景观的考虑，基于从各种数据库收集的数据，将为探索性讨论学科文化提供基线，因为它们告知或改变了 NEHJ 文献中发表的高等教育历史。本次讨论以史学、学科和方法论问题为动力，将高等教育的历史与出版领域的全球化和学术的跨国转向结合起来。检查期刊、地理和语言分布、文章和书评，揭示了 NEHJ 期刊的更大出版格局。