当前位置: X-MOL 学术Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Integrated environmental and human observations for smart cities
Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science ( IF 2.6 ) Pub Date : 2021-07-08 , DOI: 10.1177/23998083211023296
Zhixiang Fang 1 , Shih-Lung Shaw 2 , Bisheng Yang 1 , Paolo Santi 3 , Wei Tu 4
Affiliation  

The vision of smart cities (Batty, 2018; Batty et al., 2012; Kitchin, 2019; Orlowski and Romanowska, 2019) has attracted much attention in creating smart relations between technology and society, although researchers have approached it differently as a form of planning storytelling (Söderström et al., 2014), strategy (Ben Letaifa, 2015), stakeholders (Marrone and Hammerle, 2018), or forces (Angelidou, 2015). The “smartness” of smart cities is usually defined by innovative applications of data, domain, and technology (Albino et al., 2015; Allam and Dhunny, 2019; Sánchez-Corcuera et al., 2019; Silva et al., 2018; Yin et al., 2015), which illustrate the ability of improving “the quality of life, the local economy, transport, traffic management, environment and interaction with government” (Ismagilova et al., 2019: 88), sustainability (Ahad et al., 2020; Trindade et al., 2017; Vinod Kumar, 2016), and governance (Ferro de Guimarães et al., 2019; Ruhlandt, 2018) of cities. The smartness of cities is also linked with the basic needs of human beings and society, such as the physiological needs, the safety needs, the belonging needs, the esteem needs, and the self-actualization needs (Maslow, 1943). Xu and Geng (2019) introduced the notion of people-centric service intelligence for smart cities, which was an attempt to investigate smartness. When setting up physical infrastructures (smart environment and smart mobility), innovative ecosystems (smart people and smart economy), and quality of life (smart governance and smart living) for smart cities, we, therefore, need to rethink the smartness of smart cities, which is appropriate to each city based on its culture, people’s needs, economic development, and other factors.

中文翻译:

智慧城市的综合环境和人类观察

智慧城市的愿景(Batty,2018 年;Batty 等人,2012 年;Kitchin,2019 年;Orlowski 和 Romanowska,2019 年)在创建技术与社会之间的智能关系方面引起了很多关注,尽管研究人员将其作为一种形式计划讲故事(Söderström 等人,2014 年)、战略(Ben Letaifa,2015 年)、利益相关者(Marrone 和 Hammerle,2018 年)或力量(Angelidou,2015 年)。智慧城市的“智能”通常由数据、领域和技术的创新应用来定义(Albino 等,2015;Allam 和 Dhunny,2019;Sánchez-Corcuera 等,2019;Silva 等,2018; Yin 等人,2015 年),说明了改善“生活质量、当地经济、交通、交通管理、环境以及与政府的互动”的能力(Ismagilova 等人,2019:88)、可持续性(Ahad 等人)等,2020 年;特林达德等人,2017 年;Vinod Kumar,2016 年)和城市治理(Ferro de Guimarães 等人,2019 年;Ruhlandt,2018 年)。城市的智慧还与人类和社会的基本需求相关,如生理需求、安全需求、归属需求、尊重需求和自我实现需求(马斯洛,1943)。Xu and Geng (2019) 为智慧城市引入了以人为本的服务智能概念,这是对智能性的一种尝试。因此,在为智慧城市建立物理基础设施(智慧环境和智慧出行)、创新生态系统(智慧人和智慧经济)和生活质量(智慧治理和智慧生活)时,我们需要重新思考智慧城市的智慧,根据每个城市的文化,人们的需求,适合每个城市,
更新日期:2021-07-08
down
wechat
bug