当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ecol. Econ. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Integrating the green economy, circular economy and bioeconomy in a strategic sustainability framework
Ecological Economics ( IF 6.6 ) Pub Date : 2021-07-07 , DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107143
D. D'Amato 1 , J. Korhonen 2
Affiliation  

The green economy, circular economy and bioeconomy are popular narratives in macro-level sustainability discussions in policy, scientific research and business. These three narratives offer three different recipes to address economic, social and ecological goals, thus promoting different pathways for sustainability transformations. We employ the well-known Framework for Strategic Sustainable Development (The Natural Step Framework) to comparatively identify the relative and integrated contribution of the three narratives for global net sustainability. We conclude that none of the three narratives, individually, offer a comprehensive ‘package’ of solutions. However, when considered jointly as collaborative narratives, they point towards a society and economy based on renewable/reproductive and biodiversity-based/benign processes, delivering material and immaterial benefits that fulfil the economic and social requirements of all people now and in the future. While the complementary understanding of the circular economy, bioeconomy and green economy provides important guidelines for sustainability transformations post-Covid-19, there is a need for more holistic, systems-wide and integrative research work on potentially competing or supplementary sustainability narratives. This type of work of clarification and synthesis is relevant to a wide range of scholars and professionals, since the conceptual understanding of sustainability narratives informs practical implementation through strategies, actions and monitoring tools, in public and private decision-making.



中文翻译:

将绿色经济、循环经济和生物经济纳入战略可持续性框架

绿色经济、循环经济和生物经济是政策、科学研究和商业中宏观可持续性讨论中的流行叙述。这三种叙述提供了三种不同的方法来解决经济、社会和生态目标,从而促进可持续转型的不同途径。我们采用著名的战略可持续发展框架(自然步骤框架)来比较确定三种叙述对全球净可持续性的相对和综合贡献。我们得出的结论是,这三个叙述中没有一个单独提供全面的“一揽子”解决方案。然而,当被共同视为协作叙事时,它们指向基于可再生/生殖和基于生物多样性/良性过程的社会和经济,提供满足所有人现在和未来经济和社会需求的物质和非物质利益。虽然对循环经济、生物经济和绿色经济的互补理解为 Covid-19 后的可持续性转型提供了重要的指导方针,但需要对潜在竞争或补充的可持续性叙述进行更全面、全系统和综合性的研究工作。这种类型的澄清和综合工作与广泛的学者和专业人士相关,因为对可持续性叙述的概念理解通过公共和私人决策中的战略、行动和监测工具为实际实施提供信息。虽然对循环经济、生物经济和绿色经济的互补理解为 Covid-19 后的可持续性转型提供了重要的指导方针,但需要对潜在竞争或补充的可持续性叙述进行更全面、全系统和综合性的研究工作。这种类型的澄清和综合工作与广泛的学者和专业人士相关,因为对可持续性叙述的概念理解通过公共和私人决策中的战略、行动和监测工具为实际实施提供信息。虽然对循环经济、生物经济和绿色经济的互补理解为 Covid-19 后的可持续性转型提供了重要的指导方针,但需要对潜在竞争或补充的可持续性叙述进行更全面、全系统和综合性的研究工作。这种类型的澄清和综合工作与广泛的学者和专业人士相关,因为对可持续性叙述的概念理解通过公共和私人决策中的战略、行动和监测工具为实际实施提供信息。关于潜在竞争或补充可持续性叙述的全系统和综合研究工作。这种类型的澄清和综合工作与广泛的学者和专业人士相关,因为对可持续性叙述的概念理解通过公共和私人决策中的战略、行动和监测工具为实际实施提供信息。关于潜在竞争或补充可持续性叙述的全系统和综合研究工作。这种类型的澄清和综合工作与广泛的学者和专业人士相关,因为对可持续性叙述的概念理解通过公共和私人决策中的战略、行动和监测工具为实际实施提供信息。

更新日期:2021-07-08
down
wechat
bug