The present article considers acceptance and commitment training (ACT) from the perspective of interbehavioral psychology. Specifically, J. R. Kantor’s (1957) explicit distinction between constructs and events is reviewed, with particular attention given to the use of ACT in the practice settings of applied behavior analysis. It is recommended that practitioners be especially sensitive to the distinction between constructs and events as they consider employing ACT interventions. The interbehavioral field construct of interbehavioral psychology is briefly described as a context for conceptualizing both practice and research related to ACT in behavior analysis. Related conceptual issues, especially issues pertaining to the subject matter of behavior analysis and the Skinnerian concept of private events, are considered. The potential value of further integrating interbehavioral thinking into ACT practice and research is described.

本文从行为心理学的角度考虑接受和承诺训练（ACT）。具体来说，回顾了 JR Kantor (1957) 对构念和事件的明确区分，特别关注 ACT 在应用行为分析实践环境中的使用。建议从业者在考虑采用 ACT 干预措施时对构念和事件之间的区别特别敏感。行为间心理学的行为间场构造被简要描述为概念化行为分析中与 ACT 相关的实践和研究的背景。考虑了相关的概念问题，特别是与行为分析主题和斯金纳私人事件概念有关的问题。描述了进一步将行为间思维融入 ACT 实践和研究的潜在价值。