Calls for researchers to be in solidarity with research participants in hopes of reducing the exploitative research practices inherited through centuries of extractive methods have become the norm in Geography. Participatory research models, diversity in publication forums and types, and redirecting material university resources toward participants have all emerged as ways of altering research methods to practice solidarity with participants. While these are important endeavors, they do not consider solidarity as something which alters the field of research itself. When considering the complexities and limitations of the coalitional possibilities brought forth by solidarity, it becomes apparent that solidarity does not resolve the ethical dilemmas of fieldwork and knowledge production. Experience from field research in Paraguay has demonstrated that practicing solidarity as part of research raises new ethical challenges that alter the multiple encounters that constitute the research process and beyond.

中文翻译：

---

为谁团结？询问地理研究方法中的团结

呼吁研究人员与研究参与者团结一致，希望减少通过几个世纪的提取方法继承的剥削性研究实践，已成为地理学的常态。参与式研究模式、出版论坛和类型的多样性以及将大学的物质资源重新分配给参与者，都已成为改变研究方法以与参与者团结一致的方式。虽然这些都是重要的努力，但他们并不认为团结会改变研究领域本身。当考虑到团结带来的联合可能性的复杂性和局限性时，很明显团结并不能解决田野工作和知识生产的道德困境。