Sometimes, the priorities in the growing patterns create dubiousness, surprises and are proved unsuitable to re-form and redress the distortions of economy, magnifying them or even emerging news. When the external or the individual interferences are remained out of the planning, then the knowledge of why the various indices yield conflicting sectoral rankings can help the policy-makers to plan ameliorated strategies. In this paper a decomposition analysis for the components of conventional backward linkages’ (BLs’) indices and the corresponding type I multipliers (t.I-Ms’) has been taken place, in order to support the comparison and the comprehension of conflictions that are recorded on their derived sectoral rankings. For the empirical paradigm, data from the Greek economy have been used. The indicators’ appropriateness for the developmental planning has been scrutinized giving an emphasis on the model’s causality, the initial exogenous stimuli and the “intrasectoral initial trends for impacts’ generation”. The analysis provides a proof that the BL’s indices are strongly tendentious and the t.I-Ms’ are preferable for the medium-to-long run growing planning.

中文翻译：

---

传统投入产出影响指标比较与理解的分解分析：实证范式

有时，增长模式中的优先事项会造成怀疑、意外，并被证明不适合重组和纠正经济扭曲，放大它们甚至是新兴新闻。当外部或个别干扰不在规划范围内时，了解各种指数为何会产生相互冲突的部门排名可以帮助决策者制定改进策略。在本文中，对传统反向链接 (BLs') 指数的组成部分和相应的 I 类乘数 (tI-Ms') 进行了分解分析，以支持对记录的冲突的比较和理解在其派生的部门排名中。对于经验范式，使用了来自希腊经济的数据。对发展规划指标的适用性进行了审查，重点关注模型的因果关系、初始外源刺激和“影响产生的部门内初始趋势”。该分析证明，BL 的指数具有很强的倾向性，而 tI-Ms 更适合中长期种植计划。