当前位置: X-MOL 学术Earth Sci. Rev. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Reply to the discussion paper by P. Sümegi and S. Gulyás: Some notes on the interpretation and reliability of malacological proxies in paleotemperature reconstructions from loess- comments to Obreht et al.'s “A critical reevaluation of paleoclimate proxy records from loess in the Carpathian Basin”
Earth-Science Reviews ( IF 10.8 ) Pub Date : 2021-07-06 , DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103737
Igor Obreht 1 , Christian Zeeden 2 , Ulrich Hambach 3 , Daniel Veres 4 , Slobodan B. Marković 5 , Frank Lehmkuhl 6
Affiliation  

In their discussion paper, Sümegi & Gulyás (2021) expressed their concerns about our remarks regarding the reliability of malacothermometer-based July paleotemperature reconstructions for the Carpathian Basin as published in Obreht et al. (2019). We are content to see that our paper inspired the continuation of the discussion, however, we have some concerns about the criticism expressed by Sümegi and Gulyás (2021), which we in this reply address.



中文翻译:

对 P. Sümegi 和 S. Gulyás 的讨论文件的回复:关于黄土古温度重建中malacological 代理的解释和可靠性的一些说明 - 对 Obreht 等人的“对来自黄土中的古气候代理记录的批判性重新评估”的评论喀尔巴阡盆地”

在他们的讨论文件中,Sümegi 和 Gulyás(2021 年)表达了他们对我们发表在 Obreht 等人的文章中关于喀尔巴阡盆地基于温度计的七月古温度重建可靠性的评论的担忧。(2019)。我们很高兴看到我们的论文激发了讨论的继续,但是,我们对 Sümegi 和 Gulyás (2021) 表达的批评有些担忧,我们在此回复地址中对此表示担忧。

更新日期:2021-07-16
down
wechat
bug