In his Heretical Essays, Jan Patočka introduces the concept of the solidarity of the shaken. He argues that it emerges in the conditions of political violence—the frontline experience (Fronterlebnis). Moreover, Patočka brings into discussion the puzzling concepts of day, night, metanoia and sacrifice, which only further problematise the idea. Researching how other thinkers have examined the phenomenon of the frontline experience, it becomes obvious that Patočka did not invent the obscure vocabulary ex nihilo. Concepts such as frontline experience, sacrifice and the metaphors of the day and night were commonly used by thinkers in the inter-war and post-war eras in their examination of community (Gemeinschaft). This study aims to reconstruct the idea of the solidarity of the shaken as contextualized within a broader scholarly debate on the concept of community (Gemeinschaft). Through the critical dialogue between Patočka’s works and the works of Ernst Jünger and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, this study will portray how Patočka, in his discourse on the frontline experience, follows the usual pattern of overcoming one’s individuality, transcending and opening up to the constitution of solidarity. This paper will argue that Patočka defined the solidarity of the shaken in an attempt to revive the positive aspects of a community and break with the regressive (if not sinister) uses to which it was put in the twentieth century.

在他的 异端论文中，Jan Patočka 介绍了动摇者团结的概念。他认为它出现在政治暴力的条件下——前线经验（Fronterlebnis）。此外，Patočka 还讨论了白天、黑夜、metanoia 和牺牲的令人费解的概念， 这只会进一步使这个想法问题化。研究其他思想家如何检验前线经验的现象，很明显帕托奇卡并没有发明无中生有的晦涩词汇。战间和战后时代的思想家在考察社区时，经常使用前线经验、牺牲和白天黑夜的隐喻等概念（Gemeinschaft）。本研究旨在重建在关于社区概念（Gemeinschaft）的更广泛学术辩论中的背景下的动摇团结的想法。通过帕托奇卡作品与恩斯特荣格和皮埃尔泰尔哈德夏尔丹作品之间的批判性对话，本研究将描绘帕托奇卡在他关于前线经历的话语中如何遵循克服个性、超越和开放宪法的惯常模式的团结。本文将论证 Patočka 定义了动摇者的团结，试图重振社区的积极方面并打破其在 20 世纪的倒退（如果不是险恶的）用途。