Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Reliability and concurrent validity of the PUSH Band™ 2.0 to measure barbell velocity during the free-weight and Smith machine squat exercises
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology ( IF 1.1 ) Pub Date : 2021-07-05 , DOI: 10.1177/17543371211024018
Alejandro Pérez-Castilla 1 , Amador García-Ramos 1, 2 , Luis Miguel Gijón-Nieto 1 , Aitor Marcos-Blanco 1 , Felipe García-Pinillos 1, 3
Affiliation  

The aim of this study was to examine the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the PUSH Band™ 2.0 to measure barbell’s velocity during unconstrained (free-weights) and constrained (Smith machine) squat exercises. After an initial assessment of the Smith machine squat one-repetition maximum (1RM), 24 resistance-trained males completed one or two testing sessions separated by 7 days. In one session, the squat was performed with free-weights (n = 22), while in another session, the Smith machine was used (n = 16). Both testing sessions consisted of two blocks of eight repetitions (three repetitions at 45%1RM, three repetitions at 65%1RM, and two repetitions at 85%1RM). The mean velocity of the lifting phase was simultaneously recorded with the PUSH Band™ 2.0 and a gold-standard linear velocity transducer (T-Force® System). The PUSH Band™ 2.0 generally revealed an acceptable reliability (CVrange = 5.81%–13.14%), but the reliability was always greater for the T-Force® System (CVrange = 2.95%–7.86%). Regardless of the squat exercise, the concurrent validity of the PUSH Band™ 2.0 with respect to the T-Force® System was generally low at 45%1RM (ESrange = 0.18–0.33; rrange = 0.58–0.75; SEErange = 0.04–0.05 ms−1 and 4.2%–6.0%), 65%1RM (ESrange = 0.26–0.44; rrange = 0.63–0.82; SEErange = 0.04–0.06 ms−1 and 6.0%–9.2%), and 85%1RM (ESrange = 0.61–0.64; rrange = 0.66–0.82; SEErange = 0.05–0.07 ms−1 and 11.4%–16.0%). Taken together, these results suggest that the PUSH Band™ 2.0 is a reliable, but not valid, wearable technology to measure the barbell velocity during the free-weight and Smith machine squat exercises.



中文翻译:

PUSH Band™ 2.0 在自由重量和史密斯机深蹲练习中测量杠铃速度的可靠性和并发有效性

本研究的目的是检验 PUSH Band™ 2.0 在无约束(自由重量)和有约束(史密斯机)深蹲练习中测量杠铃速度的重测信度和同时效度。在对史密斯机蹲最大重复次数 (1RM) 进行初步评估后,24 名接受过阻力训练的男性完成了相隔 7 天的一两个测试阶段。在一次训练中,深蹲使用自由重量(n  = 22),而在另一次训练中,使用史密斯机(n = 16)。两个测试阶段都由两块八次重复组成(45%1RM 的 3 次重复,65%1RM 的 3 次重复,85%1RM 的两次重复)。使用 PUSH Band™ 2.0 和金标准线速度传感器(T-Force ®系统)同时记录提升阶段的平均速度。PUSH Band™ 2.0 通常显示出可接受的可靠性(CV范围 = 5.81%–13.14%),但 T-Force ®系统的可靠性始终更高(CV范围 = 2.95%–7.86%)。无论进行何种深蹲练习,PUSH Band™ 2.0 相对于 T-Force ®系统的同时有效性通常较低,为 45%1RM(ES范围 = 0.18–0.33;r范围 = 0.58–0.75;SEE范围 = 0.04–0.05 ms -1和 4.2%–6.0%),65%1RM(ES范围 = 0.26–0.44;r范围 = 0.63–0.82;SEE范围 = 0.04–0.06 ms -1和 6.0%–9.2% ) 和 85%1RM(ES范围 = 0.61–0.64;r范围 = 0.66–0.82;SEE范围 = 0.05–0.07 ms -1和 11.4%–16.0%)。综上所述,这些结果表明 PUSH Band™ 2.0 是一种可靠但无效的可穿戴技术,可用于在自由重量和史密斯机深蹲练习期间测量杠铃速度。

更新日期:2021-07-06
down
wechat
bug