The exact relationship between formal argumentation and nonmonotonic logics is a research topic that keeps on eluding researchers despite recent intensified efforts. We contribute to a deeper understanding of this relation by investigating characterizations of abstract dialectical frameworks in conditional logics for nonmonotonic reasoning. We first show that in general, there is a gap between argumentation and conditional semantics when applying several intuitive translations, but then prove that this gap can be closed when focusing on specific classes of translations.

中文翻译：

---

抽象辩证框架与非单调条件逻辑的对应关系

形式论证和非单调逻辑之间的确切关系是一个研究课题，尽管最近加大了努力，但它仍然是一个研究课题。通过研究非单调推理的条件逻辑中抽象辩证框架的特征，我们有助于更深入地理解这种关系。我们首先表明，一般来说，在应用几种直观翻译时，论证和条件语义之间存在差距，但随后证明，当关注特定类别的翻译时，这一差距可以缩小。