This article considers a scarcely explored perspective in relation to the execution of judgments of the ECtHR, notably, the formal involvement of NGOs and NHRIs. Rule 9(2) of the Committee of Minister Rules’ allows NGOs and NHRIs to participate in the supervision process for the execution of the Court’s judgments by submitting reports (Communications) in which these actors review and assess domestic authorities’ performance with respect to judgment execution. On the basis of interviews with important stakeholders, this article provides an all-round user-based perspective of this Rule 9 mechanism and its perceived impact. Doing so elucidates whether the Rule 9 procedure allows NGOs and NHRIs to engage in the important cycle of reporting and pressuring for change, the conclusions of which are important in assessing if and how Rule 9 works to advance the execution of judgments of the ECtHR.

中文翻译：

---

监督斯特拉斯堡判决执行的非政府组织和国家人权机构：对规则 9 来文的经验视角

本文考虑了与欧洲人权法院判决执行有关的一个鲜为人知的视角，特别是非政府组织和国家人权机构的正式参与。部长委员会规则第 9(2) 条允许非政府组织和国家人权机构通过提交报告（来文）参与监督执行法院判决的过程，这些行为者在报告中审查和评估国内当局在判决方面的表现执行。本文在采访重要利益相关者的基础上，提供了对第 9 条机制及其感知影响的全方位用户视角。这样做阐明了规则 9 程序是否允许非政府组织和国家人权机构参与报告和施压变革的重要循环，