当前位置: X-MOL 学术Br. J. Educ. Technol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Are pre-service teachers disinclined to utilise embodied humanoid social robots in the classroom?
British Journal of Educational Technology ( IF 6.7 ) Pub Date : 2021-07-03 , DOI: 10.1111/bjet.13144
Andreja Istenic 1, 2, 3 , Ivan Bratko 4 , Violeta Rosanda 5
Affiliation  

Teachers' readiness for technology integration depends also on their beliefs about the contribution of technology to teaching and learning, which influence their motivation for its adoption. Initial pre-service teacher education is critical in reducing the attitude-behaviour divide supporting technology acceptability, acceptance and use. Acceptance of interaction between human and robot is more complicated than human-computer interaction acceptance. Social robots are radical innovations, harder for potential users to accept in human social spaces than are incremental innovations. In 2019, a survey using a convenience sample of 121 first-year students was conducted to examine pre-service teachers' beliefs about social robot educational technology. It examined the following factors derived from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology adopted for social robots in education: Perceived social dimension, Intention to use, Perceived usability, Anxiety. Based on our findings, it seems there is a critical disjunction between researchers' efforts to equip social robots with human manners and social intelligence and participants' rejection of this technology precisely because it mimics being human. Further, we report that ICT familiarity as assessed using PISA's Information Communication Technology—ICT familiarity factors is related to robot acceptability. These findings need further examination to inform educational robotics design and Human-Robot Interaction research and teacher education and training.

中文翻译:

职前教师是否不愿意在课堂上使用具身人形社交机器人?

教师对技术整合的准备程度还取决于他们对技术对教学和学习的贡献的信念,这会影响他们采用技术的动机。最初的职前教师教育对于减少支持技术可接受性、接受度和使用的态度-行为鸿沟至关重要。人机交互的验收比人机交互的验收复杂。社交机器人是激进的创新,与渐进式创新相比,潜在用户在人类社交空间中更难接受。2019 年,以 121 名一年级学生为便利样本进行了一项调查,以检验职前教师对社交机器人教育技术的信念。它研究了从教育中社交机器人采用的技术接受和使用统一理论得出的以下因素:感知的社会维度、使用意图、感知的可用性、焦虑。根据我们的发现,似乎研究人员为社交机器人配备人类礼仪和社交智能的努力与参与者拒绝这项技术之间存在严重的脱节,正是因为它模仿人类。此外,我们报告说,使用 PISA 的信息通信技术评估的 ICT 熟悉度——ICT 熟悉度因素与机器人的可接受性有关。这些发现需要进一步检查,以告知教育机器人设计和人机交互研究以及教师教育和培训。感知社会维度、使用意图、感知可用性、焦虑。根据我们的发现,似乎研究人员为社交机器人配备人类礼仪和社交智能的努力与参与者拒绝这项技术之间存在严重的脱节,正是因为它模仿人类。此外,我们报告说,使用 PISA 的信息通信技术评估的 ICT 熟悉度——ICT 熟悉度因素与机器人的可接受性有关。这些发现需要进一步检查,以告知教育机器人设计和人机交互研究以及教师教育和培训。感知社会维度、使用意图、感知可用性、焦虑。根据我们的发现,似乎研究人员为社交机器人配备人类礼仪和社交智能的努力与参与者拒绝这项技术之间存在严重的脱节,正是因为它模仿人类。此外,我们报告说,使用 PISA 的信息通信技术评估的 ICT 熟悉度——ICT 熟悉度因素与机器人的可接受性有关。这些发现需要进一步检查,以告知教育机器人设计和人机交互研究以及教师教育和培训。努力为社交机器人配备人类的举止和社交智慧,而参与者拒绝这项技术正是因为它模仿人类。此外,我们报告说,使用 PISA 的信息通信技术评估的 ICT 熟悉度——ICT 熟悉度因素与机器人的可接受性有关。这些发现需要进一步检查,以告知教育机器人设计和人机交互研究以及教师教育和培训。努力为社交机器人配备人类的举止和社交智慧,而参与者拒绝这项技术正是因为它模仿人类。此外,我们报告说,使用 PISA 的信息通信技术评估的 ICT 熟悉度——ICT 熟悉度因素与机器人的可接受性有关。这些发现需要进一步检查,以告知教育机器人设计和人机交互研究以及教师教育和培训。
更新日期:2021-07-03
down
wechat
bug