This article analyzes the sources of gridlock in the Group of 20 since the global financial crisis. It engages with this question through Mark Beeson and Stephen Bell's framework, which identifies two processes of socialization operating concurrently within the G-20: hegemonic incorporation and collectivist cooperation. While hegemonic incorporation seeks to socialize the rising Southern powers into the US-led world order, their inclusion over time drives the G-20 toward more collective and cooperative forms of global governance. The article argues that the GFC has altered this equation in two ways: by accelerating the shift of economic power from the North to the South, and by undermining the hegemony of neoliberalism in the South. These two developments have made the United States less willing to offer the concessions necessary for hegemonic incorporation while, at the same time, bolstering the confidence of the Southern powers. Consequently, the article proposes that both hegemonic incorporation and co...

中文翻译：

---

全球金融危机以来的 20 国集团：既不是霸权也不是集体主义

本文分析了全球金融危机以来 20 国集团陷入僵局的根源。它通过 Mark Beeson 和 Stephen Bell 的框架来解决这个问题，该框架确定了在 20 国集团内同时运作的两个社会化进程：霸权合并和集体主义合作。虽然霸权合并试图将新兴的南方强国社会化到美国领导的世界秩序中，但随着时间的推移，它们的融入将推动 20 国集团走向更加集体和合作的全球治理形式。文章认为，全球金融危机在两个方面改变了这个等式：通过加速经济力量从北方向南方的转移，以及通过破坏南方新自由主义的霸权。这两个发展使美国不太愿意为霸权合并提供必要的让步，同时增强了南方大国的信心。因此，本文提出霸权合并和合作...