How do international organizations (IOs) decide to address new issues? Most IO literature focuses on why states delegate to IOs and if, when, and how IOs are able to act autonomously. Less attention is paid to how IOs may use their autonomy to bring attention to new issues. This article theorizes about IO issue emergence using a qualitative case study of the advent of the World Bank's Roma inclusion agenda. By examining a case of issue emergence that appears to diverge from state demands, we can better understand how IOs exercise their autonomy and consequently shape global policy agendas.

中文翻译：

---

国际组织自治和问题的出现：世界银行的罗姆人融合议程

国际组织 (IO) 如何决定解决新问题？大多数 IO 文献都集中在为什么状态委托给 IO 以及 IO 是否、何时以及如何能够自主行动。对 IO 如何利用他们的自主权来引起对新问题的关注的关注较少。本文通过对世界银行罗姆人包容议程出现的定性案例研究，对 IO 问题的出现进行了理论分析。通过研究一个似乎与国家要求不同的问题出现案例，我们可以更好地了解 IO 如何行使其自主权，从而塑造全球政策议程。