当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Environ. Qual. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Ammonia and nitrous oxide emission factors for excreta deposited by livestock and land-applied manure
Journal of Environmental Quality ( IF 2.2 ) Pub Date : 2021-06-30 , DOI: 10.1002/jeq2.20259
Tony J van der Weerden 1 , Alasdair Noble 2 , Cecile A M de Klein 1 , Nicholas Hutchings 3 , Rachel E Thorman 4 , Marta A Alfaro 5 , Barbara Amon 6, 7 , Ignacio Beltran 1, 5 , Peter Grace 8 , Mélynda Hassouna 9 , Dominika J Krol 10 , April B Leytem 11 , Francisco Salazar 5 , Gerard L Velthof 12
Affiliation  

Manure application to land and deposition of urine and dung by grazing animals are major sources of ammonia (NH3) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. Using data on NH3 and N2O emissions following land-applied manures and excreta deposited during grazing, emission factors (EFs) disaggregated by climate zone were developed, and the effects of mitigation strategies were evaluated. The NH3 data represent emissions from cattle and swine manures in temperate wet climates, and the N2O data include cattle, sheep, and swine manure emissions in temperate wet/dry and tropical wet/dry climates. The NH3 EFs for broadcast cattle solid manure and slurry were 0.03 and 0.24 kg NH3–N kg–1 total N (TN), respectively, whereas the NH3 EF of broadcast swine slurry was 0.29. Emissions from both cattle and swine slurry were reduced between 46 and 62% with low-emissions application methods. Land application of cattle and swine manure in wet climates had EFs of 0.005 and 0.011 kg N2O–N kg–1 TN, respectively, whereas in dry climates the EF for cattle manure was 0.0031. The N2O EFs for cattle urine and dung in wet climates were 0.0095 and 0.002 kg N2O–N kg–1 TN, respectively, which were three times greater than for dry climates. The N2O EFs for sheep urine and dung in wet climates were 0.0043 and 0.0005, respectively. The use of nitrification inhibitors reduced emissions in swine manure, cattle urine/dung, and sheep urine by 45–63%. These enhanced EFs can improve national inventories; however, more data from poorly represented regions (e.g., Asia, Africa, South America) are needed.

中文翻译:

牲畜和土地施肥沉积的排泄物的氨和一氧化二氮排放因子

粪便施用于土地以及放牧动物的尿液和粪便沉积是氨 (NH 3 ) 和一氧化二氮 (N 2 O) 排放的主要来源。使用土地施肥和放牧期间沉积的排泄物后NH 3和 N 2 O 排放的数据,开发了按气候区分类的排放因子 (EF),并评估了减缓策略的效果。NH 3数据代表温带潮湿气候下牛粪和猪粪的排放,N 2 O 数据包括温带湿/干和热带湿/干气候中牛、羊和猪粪的排放。NH 3播撒牛固体粪便和泥浆的 EF 分别为 0.03 和 0.24 kg NH 3 –N kg –1总氮 (TN),而播撒猪泥浆的 NH 3 EF 为 0.29。使用低排放应用方法,牛粪和猪粪的排放量减少了 46% 至 62%。在潮湿气候下,牛粪和猪粪在土地上施用的 EF 分别为 0.005 和 0.011 kg N 2 O–N kg –1 TN,而在干燥气候下,牛粪的 EF 为 0.0031。潮湿气候下牛尿和牛粪的 N 2 O EF 分别为 0.0095 和 0.002 kg N 2 O–N kg –1 TN,是干燥气候的三倍。然后潮湿气候下羊尿和粪便的2 O EF 分别为 0.0043 和 0.0005。硝化抑制剂的使用使猪粪、牛尿/粪便和羊尿中的排放量减少了 45-63%。这些增强的 EF 可以改善国家清单;然而,需要更多来自代表性较差地区(例如亚洲、非洲、南美洲)的数据。
更新日期:2021-06-30
down
wechat
bug