The use of evidence-based smoking cessation interventions (SCIs) can significantly increase the number of successful smoking cessation attempts. To obtain an overview of the knowledge and viewpoints on the effectiveness and use of SCIs, a three-round online Delphi study was conducted among researchers and primary care professionals (PCPs). The four objectives of this study are to gain an overview of (i) the criteria important for recommending SCIs, (ii) the perceptions of both groups on the effectiveness of SCIs, (iii) the factors to consider when counseling different (high-risk) groups of smokers and (iv) the perceptions of both groups on the use of e-cigarettes as an SCI. We found a high level of agreement within groups on which smoker characteristics should be considered when recommending an SCI to smokers. We also found that PCPs display a lower degree of consensus on the effectiveness of SCIs. Both groups see a value in the use of special protocols for different (high-risk) groups of patients, but the two groups did not reach consensus on the use of e-cigarettes as a means to quit. Making an inventory of PCPs’ needs regarding SCIs and their usage may provide insight into how to facilitate a better uptake in the primary care setting.

中文翻译：

---

对循证戒烟方法的专业观点是否一致？研究人员和医疗保健专业人员之间的德尔福研究

使用循证戒烟干预 (SCIs) 可以显着增加成功戒烟尝试的次数。为了获得关于 SCI 的有效性和使用的知识和观点的概述，在研究人员和初级保健专业人员 (PCP) 中进行了三轮在线德尔福研究。本研究的四个目标是概述 (i) 推荐 SCI 的重要标准，(ii) 两组对 SCI 有效性的看法，(iii) 咨询不同（高风险）时要考虑的因素) 吸烟者群体和 (iv) 两组对使用电子烟作为 SCI 的看法。我们发现在向吸烟者推荐 SCI 时应考虑吸烟者特征的群体内达成了高度一致。我们还发现 PCP 对 SCI 的有效性的共识程度较低。两组都认为针对不同（高风险）患者组使用特殊协议的价值，但两组并未就使用电子烟作为戒烟手段达成共识。对 PCP 对 SCI 及其使用的需求进行清点可能有助于深入了解如何促进在初级保健环境中更好地吸收。